Podcast notes – Rebel Wisdom – The State of Sensemaking

Sensemaking = understanding as a process of what’s going on in the world
Cognitive flexibility + emotional reality

Most peoples’ reality is narrowing until they can’t get out of it
Need to zoom out and zoom in appropriately

We’re in a post truth world with a huge amount of complexity

The Jordan Peterson (JP) phenomenon – why did it happen?
Produced “Glitch in the matrix” documentary

Redemptive power of truth
It burns off deadwood
How much of yourself is based on deception and lies?

Spirituality = removal of that which is false

Lot of shadows in progressive space
eg, yoga teachers becoming Qanon supporters
Shadow = aspects that are unexpressed, hidden, unconscious

Brexit + Trump = tribalism that wouldn’t acknowledge its tribalism

JP exposed this truth, the need for traditional values
“broke a conversational seal”
last gasp of the heroic individual
its necessary but not sufficient

Intersectional woke view can be weaponized – cancel culture

Consensus -> Antithesis -> Synthesis
Don’t get stuck in antithesis, the sense of certainty and lack of evolution

Tension between individual and collective
How to simultaneously be both
There’s a lot of Ayn Rand-ian fear of collectivism

Intellectual dark web was an organic alternative sensemaking mechanism

Media is still captured by narrow kind of progressivism
Becoming less and less relevant
Intellectuals are building independent brands eg Bari Weiss + Substack

Eric Weinstein – Consensus is usually achieved through combo of incentives + disincentives

JP: it’s a theological problem, we have to change who we are
Sam Harris – mainstream practices around presence, inner growth, meditation

Problem isn’t capitalism itself – good capitalism and free market are wonderful – it’s a type of exploitative behavior enabled by our modern economy

philosopher Ken Wilber – integral spirituality
the integral movement failed because people mistook the map for reality

tolerating complexity is a core skill today
hold multiple perspectives without obsessing over just one of them
meditation, reflection, these practices all help

John Vervaeke (JV) – colleague of JP’s
Meaning Crisis lecture series – crisis of meaning, there’s a void, we don’t know why we’re here, see it in identity politics, political tribes, replacing religion with politics
An emphasis on practice – Buddhism, tai chi, mindfulness
JV says “JP was a doorway but not a way”
JV says JP’s popularity comes from talking about same meaning crisis, role of myth + ritual + psychedelics
Differences: JP is Jungian, JV framework is cogsci
Be aware of cognitive traps and biases
4 types of knowledge – propositional, procedural (how to do something), participatory (immersion with world), perspectival (knowing what its like to be drunk)

If we want people to make sense of world well, can’t do it quickly, over simplified, in a distracted manner

Religious fervor around free speech especially online
Ivermectin is clearly a cult

In the future, everything will be a religion for 15 minutes

Durkheim – society always has sacred and profane and it runs through everything
eg, Constitution is sacred and OnlyFans is profane
Happening especially online

So much of what we’re seeing can’t be explained solely rationally
Recognize we’re not just rational actors
We make decisions emotionally and then post-rationalize them

Storming the capital – Qanon shaman in the capital building – heralding return of the irrational
This sort of thing will keep happening
Fascism, communism, all these bad answers with proven failures are now coming back
Qanon is perfect American religion – lots of paranoia among Americans – death of JFK, RFK, MLK – hamstrung by conspiracy theories – in a world of religion, of angels and demons – incredibly powerful story, you’re manipulated and led towards specific answers

Reintroduction of psychedelics into mainstream, shift of mainstream acceptance
Potential to transform cognition, sense of meaning and connection
Anything that meets the market (capitalism, modern economy) gets twisted and often leads further from truth

Conversation today is too focused on censorship versus free speech binary
Should focus instead on what are our responsibilities

Podcast notes – Blockchain debate with Blockworks, Avichal (Electric), and Haseeb (Dragonfly)

Blockworks Host Jason (J)
Avichal (A) – Electric
Haseeb (H) – Dragonfly

Crypto narratives today
Haseeb – narrative exhaustion; resurgence of Defi 2.0 (Wonderland); game fi has slowed (Axie price falling); overuse of metaverse; L1 wars have stabilized; interoperability is exciting but not many tokens yet
Avichal – far enough in bull market that everyone’s exhausted, like early 2018; is it a top signal; so much activity in every subsector

H: Lots of activity in private / early stage, but not much movement in public / blue chip tokens
So much web3 chatter, but most of the top coins aren’t really web3
It’s not like 2018 (lots of bullshit got funded, floor fell out of market, market lost confidence)
We’re in a waiting game, what’s the next big thing?
Lots of exciting tech is coming in 1-2 years, like big studio games, zero knowledge

A: As a startup, the promise carries you for a few years, and then the real work begins
Wonderland type drama happens all the time in normal startups – but now it’s public and liquid and transparent much earlier

J: In web2, founder has all the equity, but it’s almost flipped in web3, where founders can’t really sell, but the early employees can and are more anon / have more freedom

A: For best founders, money doesn’t change them but shows who they really are – they just dial up their game. It’s an interesting character test. Like Vitalik, it’s mission driven

J: Money is amplification of character

H: Blockchains as cities thesis
Will ETH win everything?
If blockchains are networks, then one will be completely dominant
But blockchains are physically constrained by decentralization and blocksize
Best analogy is land
ETH is old, congested, improvement is slow, but all the money and status is there (NYC)
Scaling: Rollups (skyscrapers); Alt L1 (build another city)
Cities become differentiated – NYC vs LA vs Chicago
This model predicts a few things:
1. Power law distribution of cities / blockchains
2. Rollups are important but not complete solutions
3. Bridges are important as crypto grows (moving between cities)

A: Worked at Google / Facebook
Think about it as countries not cities (bigger cultural differences, more protectionism), but generally agree w/ Haseeb
TikTok can be huge, but so can Snapchat, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc
Free trade matters, maybe need a NATO
pmarca idea – world is moving to city-state model, away from nation-state; internet is fractured, people aggregating into tribal units that are more like Greek city-states
Are there 10 or 100 L1s?

H: markets generally are neutral; there are some axes (like cost, or privacy) where it does matter
Blockchains try to be a neutral substrate

A: Value capture is tied to L1, so maybe things evolve like Flow (gaming focused, more vertical solutions)
Will fragmentation happen at app layer, or L1 layer?

H: Ethereum doesn’t have a single culture now, NFT v Defi v web3
Balkanization will happen within L1s
Solana culture feels different – high performance, build the fastest thing, everyone makes money
But the same balkanization could happen too

J: Identity could get tied up in L1s, but your identity isn’t tied to AWS v Azure v other cloud services
Identity can shift quickly based on token performance

A: If you missed one chain’s pump, you’re motivated to find a new one, but once your net worth is tied to a chain, you’re more incentivized to identify with and stay there
If I can own a piece of the network, do I HAVE to become an evangelist?
Parallels with religion – there’s an “r factor” where the faster you grow, the more likely you can win

J: If you wanna make it in Hollywood, you go to LA, if you want money you go to NYC
AMMs / lending / blue chip apps will be utilities on each L1

A: Tribes have financial incentive to improve L1, so will build apps on top of them
Nationalism is a good comparison – each nation competes with each other, and wants to support their local economies and companies

H: rarely invests in L1s now, hard to differentiate
In 2017-18, crypto was 95% religion, not many real use cases
Now you have real use cases decided by technical differences of scalability and cost and speed
Becoming less about religion, more about needs

A: At 2B crypto users, we may need a lot more L1s, maybe just a period of consolidation now. It’s 5-7 blue chip L1s today, but could it become 50-70?
Also apps choose chains based on # of users too – not just optimizing tech

H: Maybe invest in Atom / Cosmos Hub to get exposure to the long tail of L1s

J: We’re agreeing on a multichain future, and need bridges to connect the chains
Bridges are harder to build than we expected

A: Anti-bridges, if 99% of users aren’t in crypto yet, you don’t want inter-op, you wanna build your own network effects
Bridges give liquidity + some users, but none of that is really sticky
Better off acquiring new users
FB doesn’t want to get MySpace users, but get new users / new demos (like college students)
Solana wasn’t EVM compatible, wasn’t trying to get ETH users, attracting different type of users / money

H: Very pro-bridge
Solana got all its users and liquidity from FTX – which was de facto a bridge
Considers Binance / FTX bridges too – way to move assets across chains
Users don’t care if bridges are centralized or decentralized
Every social network imports email graphs – that was top of funnel – which is equivalent to Ethereum in crypto today. It’s the starting point, there was an existing graph
New users are unlikely to start with Near, most likely to show up on Coinbase and Metamask

A: Point of entry into crypto is FTX / Binance / Coinbase
Bridge technical challenges will get solved
Back to nations analogy, you want capital controls / protect your native users and companies from foreign competitors
More bullish centralized bridges (like Opensea, FTX, etc, bridges broadly defined) over decentralized bridges

H: Avalanche took off because they had a good bridge
Blockchains are economies, and amount of capital really matters
Cross chain messaging is important but central bridges won’t allow that (want to control the info flow) – thus decentralized bridges are useful for that (in addition to moving capital)

J: Sometimes crypto has reverse network effects – more users = more cost and blockchains can slow down

A: R-factor and evangelism create more / less network effects
EVM is javascript of crypto
Tooling and developer network fx
Spectrum of network fx – some are strong (eg, evangelism, being anti-other chains), others are weak – wonder how this will correlate with market structure and outcomes

Podcast notes – web3 and crypto critiques with Molly White and Jason Calacanis

This Week in Startups
Host: Jason Calacanis and Molly Wood
Guest: Molly White

Ukraine
Solicited crypto donations and received millions which was withdrawn (proving that crypto can work in adverse situations)
Binance donating $10M
PussyRiot raised $3M through a DAO for war effort

Molly White – Wikipedia editor, software engineer
Saw web3 broadening in a scary way
Launched https://web3isgoinggreat.com/ to highlight the scams and shady behaviors

A lot of tech grouped into web3 umbrella that isn’t new – ledgers aren’t new; internet payment protocols aren’t new
What’s new is cryptocurrencies – but she doesn’t believe there’s a future

Take a tech problem, add blockchain tech, and raise millions
Most can do better with different database structure

Jason: immutable database is inferior tech in 99% of cases

True believers are less common these days
Usually they’re not shilling NFTs

To truly understand web3, need to understand tech, law, economics, many domains

In a normal world, you should be concerned if you’re selling something and you can’t explain why (“why do you need a blockchain?”)

Jason: bitcoin toxicity is an explicit philosophy among maxis
Another concern – Wash trading / painting the tape (trading with yourself back and forth to pump price, or with other insiders / whales)

Melania Trump – sold a watercolor NFT, but if you analyze the blockchain data, it seems like she just bought her own NFT

Celebrity grifts – De’Aaron Fox (NBA player) did an NFT project and suddenly abandoned it (a rug pull)

web3 founders seem to believe that normal laws don’t apply – eg, copyright law
class action lawsuits have been filed, eg, Kim Kardashian

Jason: in middle of ICO lawsuits now, and NFT lawsuits will be coming in a few years
“it’s a cult”
bitcoin is good store of value, hasn’t been hacked, easy to trade

If economy collapses (Mad Max), how will bitcoin really be useful?

Energy use
Proof of work has to be increasingly energy intensive, otherwise it doesn’t work
You can’t mine on home PC anymore

What about developing economies / authoritarian regimes?
Bitcoin has more use, but exposed to new types of risk (how to actually convert to fiat, price volatility)
eg, Canadian trucker protests – difficulties withdrawing bitcoin to cash

DAOs
Why are smart contracts and blockchains required for self governance?
Most DAOs are – buy token, token = vote
Someone hijacked a DAO by buying up a lot of tokens and then drained its treasury
Self governing communities are very difficult

To believe in pure decentralization / immutability, you have to be very extreme
True believers are more libertarian / anarchist
But newer ones try to parrot it but don’t realize the drawbacks / tradeoffs

Jason: BAYC founders not happy they were doxxed – but it’s a billion dollar project!

Even doxxing has been subverted – it’s serious and egregious
But in crypto doxxing can be good – because the founders aren’t anon
BuzzFeed doxxing of BAYC was very easy / light – but reporter was aggressively doxxed in return

A lot of them are very very young – 19yo and controlling $2M

Podcast notes – Fantasy novelist Brandon Sanderson’s 3 pieces of advice

Topic: Lies that writers tell you

Loves parrots – has a pet parrot

Main lie: “You can do anything you want to”

He writes books about people who succeed despite terrible odds
Short story contest, won first prize
Judges told him the story felt strange, and then realized he’d stapled the pages backwards

Not a reader when he was a kid, thought books were boring
Middle school books felt like kids with a pet where the pet died — he wasn’t interested

A teacher got him interested in fantasy novels
Once he read them, he immediately wanted to become a writer

Two childhood desires
1) become a famous novelist
2) have a pet dragon

Survivorship bias – people want to trust successful people, but it can be a fallacy; we don’t know how much of success was skill, talent, and luck

Three pieces of advice

I will do hard things, and they will make me a better person, even if I end up failing

ONE: Make goals you have control over

“I want to win awards” – this is a goal you don’t have control over

He has a class of 15 good writers, and only 2-3 will make it professionally, even though all 15 are talented, qualified, written novels before, and still only 10-20% succeed

In 2002, had crisis of faith in writing, was actively writing, went to college with the goal of becoming a novelist. Next 10 years, wrote 13 novels, none of them sold, kept getting rejected. Weren’t dark enough. So he tried writing darker, but the writing wasn’t good. Wasn’t his style / desire
“What am I doing with my life?”
Realized even though he wasn’t succeeding, he sincerely loved writing those books
Even if he wrote 100 books that didn’t sell, he’d still consider himself a success
His goal changed from “famous novelist” to “get better at every book”
Write the books he loved, his way, and acknowledge it’s good for him even if they don’t sell
The 13th book sold, and then the 6th book sold, and his career took off

TWO: Learn how you work

Lie: “You’ll know you’re meant to be a writer if it’s the only thing you wanna do”

Some writers are like this, but not all
Writing is tough; it still feels hard for him
Figure out what motivates you, hack your brain, almost like tricking yourself

What motivates him: Track his daily word count, has a spreadsheet

Experimentation is important

THREE: Break it down

His Stormlight Archives series are LONG books, daunting for him to write it

Set goals, break into small manageable pieces

His writing classes rarely discussed HOW to be a writer, instead just read books and analyzed them

His roadmap was writing 13 novels before selling one – long hard road

Writing has great intrinsic value

Writing is a bit like telepathy

Talking to readers about how they felt, what they saw in your characters

Hope is wonderful, it’s what keeps us going, but temper your hope – combine it with the 3 tips above

Podcast notes – Leo Lucisano on crypto regulatory predictions (On The Brink)

Leo Lucisano – partner at Decentral Park Capital
On The Brink podcast, host Matt Walsh

What is DPC
Digital asset investor focused on DEFI
Just closed $75M DeFi fund
Invest across stages from pre-token / early stage to liquid investments

CPA, legal training
Worked at:
PWC – MBS and structured products
A SoFi competitor in Silicon Valley
Challenger bank in Sweden

Wrote a popular blog post on regulations
https://decentralparkcapital.substack.com/p/the-regulatory-state-22-predictions

In near term, expect tokens to be treated as securities, regulators won’t have time or expertise to properly identify “decentralized” products
Regulators have been very aggressive and will continue to be

Stablecoin regulation is coming, fit into money market / charter regime – lowest hanging fruit
Then custody – will shape how big banks and institutional custodians move into crypto and also control current CEXes, infrastructure

For large protocols focus is consumer protection
eg, Uniswap, “soft decentralization” (DAO) – still have flag bearers / people to target

Could be a Day of reckoning – tons of SEC enforcement actions against multiple projects

Expects spot ETF by July – SEC will use it to control institutional funds flow

Growing economic incentives for tradfi (eg, Wall Street banks) to pressure regulators to clarify rules, ease their entry into crypto

Challenger banks coming into crypto – like Robinhood and Square

Fairly ingrained web of contagion in crypto now – almost impossible nut to crack, but regulators must do it anyway

Fully regulated – crypto builders are doing KYC from beginning
Fully decentralized – eg Synthetix – will do ok during this regulatory wave

NFT financialization – rapidly growing space – looks a lot like defi

Regulation’s 3 buckets
1. tax revenue
2. consumer protection
3. anti money laundering (AML)

Likely that after this wave of tough 2022 regulation, we’ll see enormous growth

Crypto lobby has really matured, started in 2021
Local politicians are embracing the crypto discussion
Becoming a single issue topic – pro-crypto is good for social engagement, political donations
“power of crypto twitter”

2022 is year of the industry growing up