5 articles you should read, or at least, browse

A high school friend once confessed that he spent 4 hours a day reading the news. Ridiculous, I thought.

Here’s a running list of my readings. It’s not 4 hours – yet – and I avoid the news, but look who’s ridiculous now…

From that list, here are 5 July favorites:

1. David Brooks’ The Service Patch [link]

Young people – particularly the accomplished ones – have a “blinkered view of their options” and don’t think about the kind of person they want to be.

It’s worth noting that you can devote your life to community service and be a total schmuck. You can spend your life on Wall Street and be a hero. Understanding heroism and schmuckdom requires fewer Excel spreadsheets, more Dostoyevsky and the Book of Job.

2. Emily Nussbaum’s Difficult Women: How Sex and the City lost its good name [link]

I enjoyed SATC (see, I even used the acronym). Clever, fast, and at times provocative. The show’s weakness is that – while Carrie and friends began energetically against-type – they had a whiff of cardboard-cutout by the end.

Like the Simpsons and Friends, you were watching a magician perform the same card trick for the 37th time.

In contrast, Carrie and her friends—Miranda, Samantha, and Charlotte—were odder birds by far, jagged, aggressive, and sometimes frightening figures, like a makeup mirror lit up in neon.

3. Paul Krugman’s Hitting China’s Wall [link]

Krugman takes big public stances that have substance. His ire is usually focused on our economy, but here it turns to China.

China is in big trouble. We’re not talking about some minor setback along the way, but something more fundamental. The country’s whole way of doing business, the economic system that has driven three decades of incredible growth, has reached its limits.

4. Anahad O’Connor’s How the Hum of a Coffee Shop Can Boost Creativity [link]

I prefer working alone, but it can be hard to maintain focus; I’m always looking for hacks and tools to provide a boost. If that sounds familiar, try Coffitivity.

Their results, published in The Journal of Consumer Research, found that a level of ambient noise typical of a bustling coffee shop or a television playing in a living room, about 70 decibels, enhanced performance compared with the relative quiet of 50 decibels.

5. Paul Graham’s Do Things that Don’t Scale [link]

Another PG gem that challenges startup orthodoxy. When you’re early, it’s ok to do things that don’t scale, like Pebble assembling its own watches. You learn, you show grit, and you move your baby forward.

The need to do something unscalably laborious to get started is so nearly universal that it might be a good idea to stop thinking of startup ideas as scalars. Instead we should try thinking of them as pairs of what you’re going to build, plus the unscalable thing(s) you’re going to do initially to get the company going.

The Rage to Master

I first came upon this, from Daniel Coyle’s Talent Code:

That’s not to say that a minuscule percentage of people don’t possess an innate, obsessive desire to improve—what psychologist Ellen Winner calls “the rage to master.”

Rage to master? Interest piqued. So I googled and found Ellen’s original paper, “The Rage to Master: The Decisive Role of Talent in the Visual Arts”.

From the first paragraph:

We argue for the decisive role of talent in achieving expertise in the visual arts. By talent, we refer to an innate ability or proclivity to learn in a particular domain. We argue that individual differences in innate ability exist, and that high levels of ability include a motivational component: a strong interest in a particular domain, along with a strong drive to master that domain.

It’s important to note that Ellen defines talent as including #1 innate ability OR #2 proclivity to learn. Most people – myself included – would not include #2 in a dinner-table conversation about “talent”. To us, talent in its purest expression is Matt Damon in Good Will Hunting. A gift that comes naturally, often with apathy or even active resistance.

I’d like to think I have a “rage to master” (who wouldn’t, right?). So I found the paper interesting and wanted to share some highlights:

Capacity for endurance, concentration, and commitment to hard work…

Reminds me of deliberate practice.

…including a long and intensive period of training, first from loving and warm teachers, and then from demanding and rigorous master teachers.

Another theme in skill-development literature: younger students need teachers who foster JOY; older students need teachers who build SKILL.

They are intrinsically motivated to acquire skill in the domain (because of the ease with which learning occurs). We call this having a rage to master.

Fascinating – interest comes from ease. Conflicts with deliberate practice, but very intuitive.

Case in point: my struggles with multi-variable calculus homework (Math 51, folks?) while one fellow student clearly GOT IT…and could explain concepts better than our TA.

They make discoveries in the domain without much explicit adult scaffolding. A great deal of the work is done through self-teaching

…often do things in the domain that ordinary hard workers never do-inventing new solutions, thinking, seeing, or hearing in a qualitatively different way.

Not to be overlooked – self-teaching and self-invention are key for enduring breakthroughs (think Picasso and cubism, Beethoven and Romanticism).

A disproportionate number of adult artists and children who draw precociously are non-right-handed

Researchers (and pop culture) make a big deal of left-handedness. Not sure how much of that is connecting the dots backward.

I’m fascinated by everything talent and skill and genius. So if you have recommended books, research papers, blog posts…please share!

June: Articles + highlights

10 amazing articles I read in June. Biased towards quality, not freshness, so my apologies if you’ve seen some already:

  • 15-min vid of Spielberg film themes and techniques – my notes
  • Georgia Tech + Udacity rolling out 3-year, $7K online CS masters program. Big names, big changes in higher ed!
  • Wealthy young entrepreneur learns that the key to fulfillment is owning less (including a 420sf apt), not more
  • Well-known entrepreneur gets into zen meditation to find that inner peace :)
  • I hate (most) email newsletters. Here are a few that Matt Haughey (MetaFilter founder) likes. For me: Sinocism, Hacker Newsletter
  • Behind-the-scenes @ Tumblr with Instapaper creator and early employee Marco Armenti. Props to David Karp and his team
  • The best time to start a startup was 20 years ago. The second best time is today. Or something like that. Here’s Sam Shank, HotelTonight cofounder, on missing the Uber opportunity
  • I realize now that postponing a decision is tantamount to making a bad decision. Suster makes a strong case.
  • Dave McClure – he of the bombastically awesome blog posts and slide decks – is ALL IN on consumer internet. I am too
  • Gotta admire Chinese resourcefulness. Then there’s this wonderful pic by James Fallows

80+% of the articles I read are in my public Ever-notebook (including highlights).

What awesome stuff have you read? I’m interested in just about anything under the sun, so please share!

Spielberg’s film themes and techniques

Another great find by Kottke, a 12-minute montage of Spielberg’s films (ET, Back to the Future, Jurassic Park, Schindler’s List, and on).

Fascinating parallels in techniques & themes across Spielberg’s work…worth citing a YouTube commenter of that video:

Very good analysis, although I think that I’d disagree with your ultimate conclusion, that Spielberg’s success is attributable to a unique style. I don’t think that his stylistic and/or technical choices are that much different than many of his contemporaries (e.g., Scorsese). What sets Spielberg apart, IMO, is that he is one of the few who fuses technical mastery with a sensibility that is naturally in line with mainstream America.

Random notes (apologies to film buffs if these seem too generic or basic :) =>

  • borrows heavily from great classic films
  • enjoys moving the camera, as a dance choreographer or a composer. often uses camera movement as a form of dialogue
  • horizontal movements largely about revealing information to the audience
  • pulling in for close-ups, pulling out for wide shots serve as visual key to a scene’s emotional tone
  • john ford: the most interesting landscape is the human face
  • while we look at the characters, quite often they’re looking at something else – withholding the answer to our question: “what are they seeing?”
  • using shadow to enhance human form for comedy, heroism
  • using shapes such as circles to provide visual motifs, frames
  • spiritual and religious aspects of his work – Moses coming down the mountain, shepherd going to the lost land

May: Books I finished and my Ever-notebook of articles + highlights

These are the books I finished in March, April, and May. It was a slower period than January and February.

Before I jump into books, let me share my new experiment: a public Evernote notebook of all the articles I read and highlight. I use Clearly to accomplish this.

It’s a true representation of the text content I consume online – roughly 50% startups/tech, 20% China, 30% other (eg, sports, pop culture, psychology, science).

Here’s the link again.

I’m doing this for a few reasons:

  • I read a lot and have always wanted to share interesting articles, blogs, forums, podcasts, and videos with friends
  • I now have a permanent archive of every article I’ve read
  • I hope through sharing that readers will offer recommendations and feedback

I’d love to hear what you think, after you check it out. I will explore Flipboard’s create-your-own-magazine feature at some point. If you’re interested in doing something similar, I’m happy to help.

Books I’m reading

  • Better: A Surgeon’s Notes on Performance by Atul Gawande [Amazon]
  • Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville [Amazon]
  • Give and Take: A Revolutionary Approach to Success by Adam Grant [Amazon]
  • What Does China Think? by Mark Leonard [Amazon]

Books I finished

postcards-from-tomorrow-squarePostcards from Tomorrow Square by James Fallows [Amazon]. Great essays from a great writer on a variety of China topics: the environment; politics; manufacturing; pop culture and more. I first came across Fallows while reading his college admissions pieces in high school, and since then, I’ve enjoyed his clean, elegant prose, and his ability to combine a clear point-of-view with level-headed, thorough research. He’s also open about what he doesn’t know. You’ll enjoy this book if you want a buffet-style approach to understanding China’s myriad opportunities, peoples, and problems.

delivering-happinessDelivering Happiness by Tony Hsieh [Amazon]. Several friends independently recommended this book, plus they said it was a fast read, plus I’ve heard good things. It is indeed a fast read, with some great stories – Tony’s success speaks for itself. The first half – which covers Tony’s first startup LinkExchange and his early struggles with Zappos – is better than the second half. Not the best “startup textbook” if that’s what you’re looking for, because Tony is so unique that his secret sauce isn’t easily explained, but he gives it the old college try and you’ll certainly pick up a few tips (for me: a great culture takes care of everything else; be willing to go big on things you believe in; never stop having fun).

ready-player-oneReady Player One by Ernest Cline [Amazon]. Alan Tien recommended this book, and when I read fiction I tend towards sci-fi (recently enjoyed Name of the Wind). It’s well-written, packed with 80’s pop culture references, a classic David-v-Goliath, hometown-boy-does-good story.

I enjoy futuristic sci-fi – it’s one of my few guilty pleasures and I’m fascinated by smarter, more thoughtful peoples’ visions of the future (Ray Kurzweil is the man). Ernest doesn’t disappoint. If you enjoy the premise of Tron, you’ll like this book.

See here for a full list of books I’ve read since I’ve begun tracking.

What have you read and loved? Please share! Thanks as always for your time.