Is the Buddha a god? And other questions from the American Academy of Religion

I was browsing through the American Academy of Religion’s guidelines for how to teach religion in K12 public schools and thought the FAQ section was pretty interesting as a window into how the institutional mind addresses questions about religious belief and practice.

Below are the verbatim questions and my brief paraphrased answers.

The full curriculum guidelines are available here as a PDF.

Why do people still believe in religion?

Science has not made religion obsolete, because religion addresses fundamental questions about ethics and society.

Are religion and science incompatible?

Mostly no, although there are exceptions such as the tension between a subset of Christians and how natural evolution is taught.

Can creation science or intelligent design be taught in schools?

Yes, but not in science classes, and preferably alongside “a diversity of worldviews.”

Does the Bible say that homosexuality is wrong?

Some would say yes. Others would say no.

Do Jews believe in heaven?

Most Jews believe humans have a soul which survives the physical body. Also, “heaven” is mostly a Christian concept.

Did the Jews kill Jesus?

It’s complicated, but Romans and non-Jews were also involved in his death.

Is the Buddha a god?

What do you mean by the word “god”?

Do you have to follow all the rules of a religion to be religious?

Some might say yes. Others would say no.

Is God real?

It’s not a teacher’s place to say.

Is Islam a violent religion?

Blame the media.

I’m Hindu (or Muslim, Christian, Buddhist) and my religion is really different from the Hinduism (or Islam, Christianity, Buddhism) we are studying. Why?

Religion is complicated.

Why do we need to study religion anyway? We’re in school, not church!

“It is impossible to understand human history and culture without understanding its religious dimensions”

For more of my writings on religion and spirituality, here’s a post on why religion is actually growing across the world, and here are some useful definitions of religion.

A couple Google search trends on religion and spirituality

Just putzing around with the Google trends tool and wanted to share a few charts.

So in the US, people search for the word “God” quite a bit more than soul, religion, and faith. Interestingly it’s also the only word growing in search popularity.

“Islam” is leading in search popularity in the US, by a wide-ish margin. Then Christianity, then Buddhism, then a virtual tie between Hinduism and Judaism.

Worldwide, it’s not even close. “Islam” wins by a huge margin. There are many caveats here, starting with the fact that these are results for English language searches only. The caveats become obvious in the next chart:

Because “Jesus” is the clear leader. I tried different spellings of Muhammad as well. What caused that spike for “Muhammad” (red line) in mid-2016?

And finally, worldwide, “yoga” is growing by leaps. Meditation and prayer comparatively steady.

What is religion? 3 useful and simple definitions


Don’t worry, this won’t be a long post. I have neither the knowledge nor ability to give a comprehensive definition. All I want to do today is share a couple interesting tools that you can use to broaden and deepen your understanding.

Trying to define religion is like trying to define “culture” or “love”. The answer is fluid and driven heavily by time & place. For example, many people argue that “religion” itself is a modern Western and largely Judeo-Christian concept. It’s contentious and complex enough that Wikipedia even has a dedicated entry for the “definition of religion”.

Modern science is based on the principle, give us one free miracle and we’ll explain all the rest – Terrence McKenna

I share the above quote because it so neatly expresses a central reason why religion exists, which is to explain and empathize that which we do not know. And when science has done its best, when its formulated multiverses and string theory and the Big Bang and maybe even explained what happened before the Big Bang, there will still be more mysteries we can’t explain, more questions math and science can’t answer. Religion begins there.

Or as Jonathan Sacks says, religion helps us answer these questions:

Who am I? Why am I here? How then shall I live?

Definition #1: The 4 B’s — Belonging, Believing, Bonding, and Behaving

We distinguish among four dimensions of religion: belonging to a religious denomination, believing certain religious propositions, bonding to religious practices, and behaving in a religious manner – Vassilis Saroglou

Sources: 1, 2

For example, in a broadly Christian context —

Belonging: I am a member of X denomination, Y church, and Z small group

Believing: I believe Jesus died for our sins and on the third day, was reincarnated before ascending to Heaven

Bonding: I identify as a Christian because of things I do, like prayer and Church attendance

Behaving: I don’t work on Sunday; I don’t say the Lord’s name in vain; etc

Definition #2: The 7 Dimensions of Religion

A framework developed by Scottish professor Ninian Smart. I like this one because it’s comprehensive.

1. Ritual: Forms and orders of ceremonies (private and/or public) (often regarded as revealed)

2. Narrative and Mythic: stories (often regarded as revealed) that work on several levels. Sometimes narratives fit together into a fairly complete and systematic interpretation of the universe and human’s place in it.

3. Experiential and emotional: dread, guilt, awe, mystery, devotion, liberation, ecstasy, inner peace, bliss (private)

4. Social and Institutional: belief system is shared and attitudes practiced by a group. Often rules for identifying community membership and participation (public)

5. Ethical and legal: Rules about human behavior (often regarded as revealed from supernatural realm)

6. Doctrinal and philosophical: systematic formulation of religious teachings in an intellectually coherent form

7. Material: ordinary objects or places that symbolize or manifest the sacred or supernatural

And in a Buddhist context —

1. Ritual: A meditation practice every morning at 5am

2. Narrative: Buddha began his life as a young noble man named Siddhartha Gautama who…

3. Experiential: The peace and clarity that come from meditative practice; The sense of belonging and discipline that come from following the Dharma

4. Social: The Sangha, the community, the monastic order

5. Ethical: The 5 Precepts (Don’t harm others, Don’t steal, Don’t lie, Don’t have improper sexual relations, Don’t intoxicate oneself eg, alcohol, coffee)

6. Doctrinal: The Tripitaka

7. Material: The orange robes that Theravada Buddhist monks wear

Definition #3: The 9 ways that people relate to God

This is from a book by Gary Thomas called Sacred Pathways [Amazon].

I like this one because it’s personal and intimate. Even more than the first two, this one is Judeo-Christian in its worldview, but I believe it can still be helpful for understanding other faiths.

…people worshiped that one God in many ways: Abraham had a religious bent, building altars everywhere he went. Moses and Elijah revealed an activist’s streak in their various confrontations with forces of evil and in their conversations with God. David celebrated God with an enthusiastic style of worship, while his son, Solomon, expressed his love for God by offering generous sacrifices. Ezekiel and John described loud and colorful images of God, stunning in sensuous brilliance. Mordecai demonstrated his love for God by caring for others, beginning with the orphaned Esther. Mary of Bethany is the classic contemplative, sitting at Jesus’ feet.

1. Naturalists are most inspired to love God out-of-doors, in natural settings

2. Sensates love God with their senses and appreciate beautiful worship services that involve their sight, taste, smell, and touch, not just their ears

3. Traditionalists draw closer to God through rituals, liturgies, symbols, and unchanging structures

4. Ascetics prefer to love God in solitude and simplicity

5. Activists love God through confronting evil, battling injustice, and working to make the world a better place

6. Caregivers love God by loving others and meeting their needs

7. Enthusiasts love God through celebration

8. Contemplatives love God through adoration

9. Intellectuals love God by studying with their minds

Which one are you? I would consider myself a combination of Ascetic, Activist, and Intellectual.

A few final quotes

“Every religion recognizes man as equally insignificant in relation to Infinity;—and therefore every religion always contains the idea of the equality of all men before that which it regards as God, whether that be lightning, the wind, a tree, an animal, a hero, a deceased or even a live king, as it was in Rome.” – Tolstoy

“A person’s ultimate concern” – Paul Tillich

“The feeling of absolute dependence. A sense and taste for the infinite.” – F. Schleiermacher

Thanks for reading! In previous posts, I explored whether Silicon Valley will disrupt religion, and used the Lindy Effect to explain why religious knowledge will always be valuable.

100 years ago, Britain realized marijuana was harmless

In 1893, the British became concerned with what they felt to be excessive marijuana smoking in the eastern province of Bengal, India. So the House of Commons appointed a 7 member Commission to study the problem.

From Wikipedia:

The report the Commission produced was at least 3,281 pages long, with testimony from almost 1,200 “doctors, coolies, yogis, fakirs, heads of lunatic asylums, bhang peasants, tax gatherers, smugglers, army officers, hemp dealers, ganja palace operators and the clergy.

Their conclusion, in my words: There are no harmful physical, mental, or moral effects to smoking marijuana, with exceptions for excessive use, and for people who were already at risk due to previous physical or mental illness.

Some choice quotes:

It has been clearly established that the occasional use of hemp in moderate doses may be beneficial; but this use may be regarded as medicinal in character.

In regard to the physical effects, the Commission have come to the conclusion that the moderate use of hemp drugs is practically attended by no evil results at all. […] There is probably nothing the use of which may not possibly be injurious in cases of exceptional intolerance. […] As in the case of other intoxicants, excessive use tends to weaken the constitution and to render the consumer more susceptible to disease.

…the moderate use of these drugs produces no mental injury. It is otherwise with the excessive use. Excessive use indicates and intensifies mental instability

In regard to the moral effects of the drugs, the Commission are of opinion that their moderate use produces no moral injury whatever. […] Excessive consumption, on the other hand, both indicates and intensifies moral weakness or depravity

It has been the most striking feature in this inquiry to find how little the effects of hemp drugs have obtruded themselves on observation. The large number of witnesses of all classes who professed never to have seen these effects, the vague statements made by many who professed to have observed them, the very few witnesses who could so recall a case as to give any definite account of it, and the manner in which a large proportion of these cases broke down on the first attempt to examine them, are facts which combine to show most clearly how little injury society has hitherto sustained from hemp drugs

I came across this report as a result of my research into religion and drug use. The use of marijuana (known locally as “bhang”) within Indian culture and Hindu practice was at that time both common and longstanding. I can’t speak to the circumstances today. Relevant excerpts:

To the Hindu the hemp plant is holy. A guardian lives in the bhang leaf. As the wife of Vishnu, the preserver, lives in the hysteria-curing tulsi, or Holy Basil, and as Shiva dwells in the dysentery-scaring bel, AEglemarmelos, so the properties of the bhang plant, its power to suppress the appetites, its virtue as a febrifuge, and its thought-bracing qualities show that the bhang leaf is the home of the great Yogi or brooding ascetic Mahadev.

According to an old Hindu poem, on which I cannot now lay my hands, Civa himself brought down the bhang plant from the Himalayas and gave it to mankind. Jogis are well-known consumers of bhang and ganja, and they are worshippers of Civa.

In folk-songs, ganja or bhang (with or without opium) is the invariable drink of heroes before performing any great feat. At the village of Bauri in Gaya there is a huge hollow stone, which is said to be the bowl in which the famous hero Lorik mixed his ganja. Lorik was a very valiant general, and is the hero of numerous folk-songs.

Fascinating, no?

The Commission’s full report and some modern analysis can be found here.

10 observations on religion & faith in America, from the book American Grace

I finished the book American Grace [Amazon] more than 5 years ago, but decided to re-read my saved Kindle highlights as part of a renewed focus on studying and writing about organized religion and religious wisdom.

The book is dense. A ton of information on America’s religious landscape: how it’s evolved in the 20th century, which denominations are growing and shrinking, how religion overlaps and interplays with American politics, education, and culture. And great case studies. The book is more suited to an academic audience, given its heavy use of surveys and scholarly writing style.

Here are 10 things I learned, with supporting book excerpts.

One: America is unique among developed nations today in its strong religiosity

Americans have high rates of religious belonging, behaving, and believing—what social scientists call the three Bs of religiosity. […] The United States ranks far ahead of virtually all other developed nations in terms of all three Bs of religiosity.

The General Social Survey also suggests that the fraction of Americans with a self-described “strong” religious affiliation has held steady at just over one third (35–40 percent) since 1974 […] we begin with the bedrock fact that America is now and always has been an unusually religious country.

America is the birthplace of myriad new faiths, some of which flourish and some of which flounder. Examples abound, but include Pentecostalism, Seventh-day Adventists, the Christian Scientists, and the Mormons. In other cases, new religions were born abroad but found a receptive audience in America, like the Methodists, the Shakers, and even the Unification Church.

Alexis de Tocqueville, the famous French visitor to America four decades later, also thought that democracy in America rested in part on Americans’ unusual religiosity.

sociologist Robert Bellah has described the nation’s civil religion, which stands apart from the beliefs of any particular sect, denomination, or religious tradition. In his words, “the civil religion was able to build up without any bitter struggle with the church powerful symbols of national solidarity and to mobilize deep levels of personal motivation for the attainment of national goals.

Two: Women are more religious than Men…and within organized religion there is a gender ceiling much like in politics and business

Women read scripture, talk about religion, and read religious books more than men. […] No matter the specific yardstick, women exhibit a greater commitment to, involvement with, and belief in religion.

…the difference between religious and secular women is modestly but consistently greater than the difference between religious and secular men.

Women represented a paltry 8 percent of clergy in churches as recently as 2006–2007 (up from 6 percent in 1998), although women represent a third of all students in theological schools.

Three: Religious behavior varies widely by ethnicity, although religious bridging and mixing is on the rise

…who personifies the most religious type of American? An older African American woman who lives in a Southern small town. And the least religious? A younger Asian American man who lives in a large Northeastern city.

…the stronger the ethnic identity, the stronger the religious identity. One notable exception, as suggested by the data on counties, is evangelicals. They rank high on the importance of religion, but low on the importance of their ethnicity. Mormons are also off the line.

Among African Americans, in fact, religion has increasingly become a middle-class affair. Since roughly the mid-1980s, black college graduates have become increasingly likely to attend church.

Though the Mormon population in Utah has formed what is perhaps the strongest conservative voting bloc in the country, most members insist that this phenomenon is not the result of directives from inside the church.

Four: We tend to become more religious as we age

Most people become somewhat more observant religiously as they move through their thirties, marry, have children, and settle down. Then as we retire and approach the end of our lives, we often experience another phase of increased religiosity—“nearer my God to thee,” perhaps.

Five: Evangelism is dead / dying

Since this fact is not widely understood, it is worth reemphasizing—the evangelical boom that began in the 1970s was over by the early 1990s, nearly two decades ago

Six: American Catholicism is undergoing great change

…roughly 60 percent of all Americans today who were raised in America as Catholics are no longer practicing Catholics, half of them having left the church entirely and half remaining nominally Catholic, but rarely, if ever, taking any part in the life of the church.

…by dint of their sheer numbers, Latinos are reshaping the American Catholic Church, with every indication that their impact will only increase in years to come. […] Latinos comprise roughly 15 percent of Catholics age fifty and above. That percentage increases to 34 percent for those ages thirty-five to forty-nine (roughly the overall average), and then rises to 58 percent among Catholics under thirty-five.

Seven: Community and friendships are what keep people in a Church

The fact that friends rank so low suggests that it is more common to become friends with members of their congregation than to be pulled into a congregation because of one’s friends.

Americans may select their congregations primarily because of theology and worship, but the social investment made within that congregation appears to be what keeps them there.

Eight: Church attendance is positively correlated with education and income

Secularization (at least in terms of organized religion) seems to be proceeding more rapidly among less educated Americans.

…over roughly the last thirty years, it is the working class who have become less likely to attend church relative to the upper class.

Among African Americans, in fact, religion has increasingly become a middle-class affair. Since roughly the mid-1980s, black college graduates have become increasingly likely to attend church.

Nine: Religious Americans are more involved in their communities and give back more

…while religiosity has a significant positive effect on secular giving, it has an even greater positive effect on secular volunteering.

…the civic difference between Americans who attend church nearly every week and those who rarely do so is roughly equivalent to two full years of education.

Religious Americans express significantly more trust than secular Americans do in shop clerks, neighbors, co-workers, people of their own ethnicity, people of other ethnicities, and even strangers.

Other things being equal, the difference in happiness between a nonchurchgoer and a weekly churchgoer is slightly larger than the difference between someone who earns $10,000 a year and his demographic twin who earns $100,000 a year.

Ten: America is a place of great religious diversity, tolerance, and bridging

By a wide margin, Americans see the value in religious diversity for its own sake.

The explanation for the fact that so many Americans appear to disregard the theology of their religions rests in the religious bridging within their personal social networks.

America has had sporadic religious riots, but no sustained religious wars.