Guest: Nick Johnson, ENS lead dev
Kiwi; Lived in New Zealand, Ireland, the UK
Goal never was to launch DAO, goal was maximally achievable decentralization — at that time there was only “The DAO” and not a lot of examples or playbook
Launched purely as governance mechanism – what to do with funds raised from registration fees?
Started with generous ETH Foundation grant
ENS is public good, non profit, goal is to leave as much value behind for users as possible
Believes protocols should all be public goods – things like ETH, L2, infrastructure
“If you want people to innovate on your platform then your platform should be open”
Makes exception for apps eg, DeFi, DEXes
Grew up with internet in 90s – open governance at the time, thing that everyone can improve on, left big impression on him
In 90s AOL didn’t succeed because it was walled garden, too much friction, extracting value that wasn’t re-invested in ecosystem
Attitude in web3 that working in nonprofit / charity gets paid badly and need sacrifice — totally reasonable to pay market rate
ENS token
-best tool we had available, but have shortcomings – eg, tendency to plutocracy
-intentionally launched as governance token, not a profit-accruing token
-wrote ENS Constitution explicitly states that revenue will not return to token holders – instead used to re-invest in ecosystem
ENS didn’t launch as a DAO – felt DAO ecosystem, tooling, examples weren’t there
What changed – use of OpenZeppelin contracts; human control of ENS had been reduced
Can be frustrating to run DAO – differing visions
Lots of parallels to corporate governance, but built more like a co-op than a for-profit
Delegation is still necessary – you don’t want token holders voting on every single decision
What if VCs buy a lot of tokens?
“Probably our biggest risk”
Defenses are social (lots of tokens given to long-term contributors, core team) and financial (would need to spend too much relative to value of $ in treasury)
“Constitution as friction mechanism”
ENS Labs is centralized, get budget and is “hired” by DAO
Hope to see other development orgs funded to help ENS (besides ENS Labs)
Quadratic voting is elegant but only works if you can solve Sybil problem (prove it’s a real human, not bots)
Imagine a good ID system, can still offer $50 to stranger on street to use their ID
Voting escrow tokens (lock tokens to get more weight or just participate in voting) – provides way to show long-term commitment to organization
Tough to design token economic / voting systems that can’t be gamed
Cares about financial privacy
KYC doesn’t reduce money laundering but does reduce financial privacy
Tornado Cash is great example – the devs actually built in compliance mechanisms – but OFAC / Dutch prosecutors ignored that and still charged them with money laundering
Optimism is public benefit corp – very encouraging
More skeptical of StarkNet (raised a lot of VC)
Just share the code, even if its messy – so many benefits from open source
Need more DAO tooling for day to day governance, a unified platform
Helpful to have OpenZeppelin’s version of the governor contractor – based on Compound’s – ENS DAO was one of first to use it
Will see more professional DAO delegates
What excites him
–see DAO move to long-term vision, setup an endowment to last 50-100 years
-integrating with DNS
-offchain names – names w/o reg fees
-happy to see Ethereum hasn’t fallen into trap that Bitcoin did which resists any change
–
DAO provided meaningful outlet for community to contribute eg, small grants program
“Giving them permission to be involved”
Often low participation is because people have selected themselves out of it – you don’t have to be prominent to make a contribution