Random notes 2: bitcoin as pure money; inequality between countries is decreasing; “a corporation is like a rogue AI”

I’ll try to share a post like this every week, it’s an opportunity for me to organize and review my notes from what I’ve watched/read/listened to over the past week. Here is the first installment from last week.

My favorite information mediums right now are podcasts and online articles (queued in Pocket), followed by ebooks (Kindle) and YouTube.

First, some art:

Sunshine by Hiroshi Nagai

The piece is called Sunshine, by Hiroshi Nagai.

Ark’s new paper on “Bitcoin as novel economic institution” [download here]

  • During the last 10 to 15 years, countries have been increasing capital controls rather than decreasing them. Since 2007, the share of countries increasing capital controls has soared 300% to 15%, while the share of countries reducing them has dropped 60% to 5%,
  • In the last century, three monetary policy changes cascaded, cutting the purchasing power of almost half of the world’s currencies by 50%: the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 and Europe’s decision to abandon the gold standard in 1918, the US shift from the gold standard to the gold-exchange standard in 1933, and US abandonment of the gold exchange standard in 1971.,
  • Moreover, in the US today the minimum reserve requirement for deposit institutions is zero. Indeed, since 1995 the average bank reserve requirement globally has dropped by nearly 80%,
  • Lowercase ‘b’ bitcoin, the asset, is a standardized unit of value embedded in the network. Its value acts as the signaling mechanism that aligns network stakeholders. In some ways, we believe it is the purest form of money ever created:
  • Since its creation, Bitcoin has settled more than $2.5 trillion in transactions, as shown in Figure 8, the average size of which has been $2,000.

…eagerly awaiting Ark’s part 2.

If you want a better understanding of the global economy and how it relates to your own investment decisions, you can’t do better than Lyn Alden. I’ve been binging her newsletter and writings and podcast appearances. Here are some excerpts:

  • here is how the Bank of England defines QE on their website, in case we want to hear what the Brits would call it: “Money is either physical, like banknotes, or digital, like the money in your bank account. Quantitative easing involves us creating digital money. We then use it to buy things like government debt in the form of bonds. You may also hear it called ‘QE’ or ‘asset purchase’ – these are the same thing.”
  • Currently, the U.S. has about $1.8 trillion in currency in circulation and $16 trillion in broad money supply (which also includes checking accounts, savings accounts, CDs, all sorts of digital cash and cash-like assets).
  • Russia, for example, is buying massive amounts of gold year after year, including buying straight through their 2015/2016 recession. They’ve increased their gold reserves by 5x over the past decade, from 400 tons to 2,000 tons
  • Historically, the bond market has been the “smart money” because it is largely driven by institutional investors rather than retail investors. It tends to be more focused on near-term math than on emotion or long-term projections, and as such tends to front-run the equity market, at least in terms of major transitions.
  • There was a nearly four-decade period from the mid-1930’s to the mid-1970’s where buying and holding Treasuries was a fool’s errand, because they mostly lost purchasing power by failing to keep up with inflation. This was during a period of major long-term debt deleveraging and currency devaluation.

The Foreign Affairs has a very striking article on how global inequality is falling between countries:

  • People in the middle of the global income distribution, whose incomes grew substantially, overwhelmingly lived in Asia, many of them in China. People farther to the right, who were richer than the Asians but experienced much lower income growth rates, mainly lived in the advanced economies of Japan, the United States, and the countries of western Europe. Finally, people at the far right end of the graph, the richest one percent, enjoyed high income growth rates much like those in the middle of the global income distribution.
  • As measured by the Gini coefficient, which ranges from zero (a hypothetical situation in which every person has the same income) to one (a hypothetical situation in which one person receives all income), global inequality fell from 0.70 in 1988 to 0.67 in 2008 and then further to 0.62 in 2013
  • High growth in China, in global terms, is ceasing to be an equalizing force. Soon, it will contribute to rising global inequality. But India, with a population that may soon surpass China’s and is still relatively poor, now plays an important role in making the world more equal. In the last 20 years, China and India have driven the reduction in global inequality. From now on, only Indian growth will perform that same function
  • If China’s growth continues to exceed Western countries’ growth by two to three percentage points annually, within the next decade many middle-class Chinese will become wealthier than their middle-class counterparts in the West. For the first time in two centuries, Westerners with middling incomes within their own nations will no longer be part of the global elite—that is, in the top quintile (20 percent) of global incomes. This will be a truly remarkable development. From the 1820s onward—when national economic data of this kind were first collected—the West has consistently been wealthier than any other part of the world

Thought provoking tweet from Brian Roemmele (his account drops similar thought-provokers on a daily basis):

Apparently, negative emotions can be useful if we believe they’re useful:
The team found that the link between negative mental states and poor emotional and physical health was weaker in individuals who considered negative moods as useful. Indeed, negative moods correlated with low life satisfaction only in people who did not perceive adverse feelings as helpful or pleasant.

Some of my own notes from TechCrunch’s Alex Wilhelm on the Indie Hackers podcast:

  • Their best performing pieces are explainer-y pieces eg how to structure a cap table; insane shelf life but also a lot of planning and work
  • Really important to write about current events because that’s what gets attention and gets shared.
  • If you have a broader point, connect it to a news story that’s happening right now
  • It’s about the “newshook” – the key news event that happened (eg, Tesla shares soared 20% after stock split; father of three killed in 4-way crash)

Are we presently in a fourth turning?
Howe and Strauss observe that American history shows a new era, or “turning” about every 20 years. In simplest terms, the “First Turning” is an upbeat era of strengthening institutions. The “Second Turning” is an awakening, a passionate era of spiritual upheaval, when the old order comes under attack. The “Third Turning” is an unraveling — a time when individualism is strengthened and institutions are weakened. The “Fourth Turning” is a crisis, a decisive era of secular upheaval — the old order is toppled and a new one put in its place.

For me, the concept has echoes of Sovereign Individual.

On the rise and rise of US disability benefits recipients:

  • The federal government spends more money each year on cash payments for disabled former workers than it spends on food stamps and welfare combined
  • “That’s a kind of ugly secret of the American labor market,” David Autor, an economist at MIT, told me. “Part of the reason our unemployment rates have been low, until recently, is that a lot of people who would have trouble finding jobs are on a different program.”

Real estate investor with large YouTube following believes a housing crash is coming in 2021. Here are my notes on his reasons why:
1. There was a temporary supply decline during the pandemic, but a lot of supply is coming back now
2. Interest rates can’t get lower
3. There are millions with no or reduced jobs
Lastly, he believes property taxes will increase in most metros

Luke Gromen on Erik Townsend’s Macro Voices podcast

  • Biggest surplus nations: EU then China then Japan
  • Biggest deficit nations: US then UK
  • Eurodollar market is 60-100T, and Luke believes Fed willing to bail out whole thing if necessary to prevent system collapse
  • Global banks have stopped buying US Treasuries for first time in 70 years…this already started in 2014
  • US true interest payments already more than 100% of tax receipts
  • Luke quoting Marc Faber: when things get really bad, the price of everything goes up
  • Dutch National Bank: If whole thing collapses, we own gold because gold will be used to rebuild the whole thing
  • It’ll be gold at 22K – 10x from here, not 10-20% moves
  • If that happens there will be a debt jubilee. Bond holders and creditors would get burned

Enjoyed this NYT profile of mathematician Eugenia Cheung

  • Deep nonfiction takes longer to absorb, and math books take years. I love the act of turning pages when I’m reading a novel; when I’m studying a math book I might need to spend several weeks on one paragraph.
  • It’s easier to “bridge” science and art when you don’t really think there’s a gap between them in the first place, as I don’t. The boundaries between subjects are really artificial constructs by humans, like the boundaries between colors in a rainbow.

Improve your posture, improve your teeth? from the NYT
If you’re wondering why a dentist cares about ergonomics, the simple truth is that nerves in your neck and shoulder muscles lead into the temporomandibular joint, or TMJ, which connects the jawbone to the skull. Poor posture during the day can translate into a grinding problem at night

From The Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, which I am enjoying in spite of its depressing revelations:
Creating an easy-to-learn language had been President Sukarno’s highest priority after Indonesia won its independence from the Netherlands. More than 350 languages and dialects are spoken throughout the archipelago, and Sukarno realized that his country needed a common vocabulary in order to unite people from the many islands and cultures. He recruited an international team of linguists, and Bahasa Indonesia was the highly successful result. Based on Malay, it avoids many of the tense changes, irregular verbs, and other complications that characterize most languages.

Darius Kazemi’s AI and Art talk on YouTube had me scratching my head in a good way.

  • “A pun is a context switch”
  • “Corporation is like a rogue AI”
  • “Capital is teleological, it has goals, and it’s goal is to increase capital”
  • Humans are really good at enslaving others, which is why we also fear AI will enslave us (in other words, we are projecting)

After watching, I immediately queued several of his YT talks.

Reed Hastings interviewed on The Economist podcast:

  • Netflix key metric is the ratio of total-time-watched-to-cost
  • Has $15B in debts
  • Added 30M subscribers in 1H2020
  • Question he likes to ask: Is the internet going to grow or shrink in next 20 years?
  • Admire and fear Disney, it’s streaming service grew to 60M subscribers in first year, it took Netflix 12 years

That’s it folks. All typos and misrepresentations are 100% mine! Here’s the first random notes post if you like informational potpourri. Til the next one!

Highlights from The Book of Satoshi

Phil Champagne does a great job of collecting, organizing, and providing context for all of Satoshi’s known public writing. Here are some of my favorite excerpts from the book. Amazon link.

The below are copied verbatim from the book. I may have mistakenly attributed some things to Satoshi that were actually Phil’s own words. Hopefully nothing major!

Highlights:

For greater privacy, it’s best to use bitcoin addresses only once. You can change addresses as often as you want…

Those coins can never be recovered, and the total circulation is less. Since the effective circulation is reduced, all the remaining coins are worth slightly more. It’s the opposite of when a government prints money and the value of existing money goes down.

“natural deflation”… I like that name for it. Yes, there will be natural deflation due to payment mistakes and lost data. Coin creation will eventually get slow enough that it is exceeded by natural deflation and we’ll have net deflation.

In the absence of a market to establish the price, NewLibertyStandard’s estimate based on production cost is a good guess and a helpful service (thanks). The price of any commodity tends to gravitate toward the production cost. If the price is below cost, then production slows down. If the price is above cost, profit can be made by generating and selling more. At the same time, the increased production would increase the difficulty, pushing the cost of generating towards the price.

One argument is that anyone who chooses to generate coins is actually making the choice to purchase bitcoins with electricity/computational resources, and that because some/ many people are in fact making that choice, bitcoins have at least that much “value” to the generators, who can be assumed to be maximizing their utility.

It’s hard to imagine the Internet getting segmented airtight. It would have to be a country deliberately and totally cutting itself off from the rest of the world. Any node with access to both sides would automatically flow the block chain over, such as someone getting around the blockade with a dial-up modem or sat-phone. It would only take one node to do it. Anyone who wants to keep doing business would be motivated.

I anticipate there will never be more than 100K nodes, probably less. It will reach an equilibrium where it’s not worth it for more nodes to join in. The rest will be lightweight clients, which could be millions.

I think the traditional qualifications for money were written with the assumption that there are so many competing objects in the world that are scarce, an object with the automatic bootstrap of intrinsic value will surely win out over those without intrinsic value. But if there were nothing in the world with intrinsic value that could be used as money, only scarce but no intrinsic value, I think people would still take up something.

Bitcoins have no dividend or potential future dividend, therefore not like a stock. More like a collectible or commodity.

It would be unwise to have permanently recorded plaintext messages for everyone to see. It would be an accident waiting to happen. If there’s going to be a message system, it should be a separate system parallel to the bitcoin network. Messages should not be recorded in the block chain.

I wish you wouldn’t keep talking about me as a mysterious shadowy figure, the press just turns that into a pirate currency angle. Maybe instead make it about the open source project and give more credit to your dev contributors; it helps motivate them.

From the author:

One of the major benefits of such decentralized domain name servers would bypass a government attempt at disrupting Internet communications to its citizens, as we have seen occur in Egypt in 2011.

His various writings seem to indicate that he did not expect Bitcoin to take off as rapidly as it has.

From a commenter:

The real problem with the DNS system as it exists today is that somebody has to own theroot. At the end of the day, you have to trust ICANN.

“Platforms for rule-breaking apps”, or what we can learn from BitTorrent about the true value of decentralization

For anyone remotely interested in internet history, BitTorrent, and cryptocurrency, I recommend reading this great 4-part essay by Simon Morris, BitTorrent’s former Chief Strategy Officer:

Part 1 – https://medium.com/@simonhmorris/why-bittorrent-mattered-bittorrent-lessons-for-crypto-1-of-4-fa3c6fcef488

Part 2 – https://medium.com/@simonhmorris/if-youre-not-breaking-rules-you-re-doing-it-wrong-bittorrent-lessons-for-crypto-2-of-4-72c68227fe69

Part 3 – https://medium.com/@simonhmorris/intent-complexity-and-the-governance-paradox-bittorrent-lessons-for-crypto-3-of-4-1d14ac390f3f

Part 4 – https://medium.com/@simonhmorris/decentralized-disruption-who-dares-wins-bittorrent-lessons-for-crypto-4-of-4-f022e8641c1a

Here are some of my favorite highlights in the series:

  • The general purpose public blockchains out there might best be understood as platforms for rule-breaking apps.
  • coordination is hard and costly especially with many paranoid participants whose interests are not necessarily obvious to you — in the world of Bittorrent this meant that changes to different parts of the Bittorrent protocol to introduce obvious win:win optimizations or attack mitigations took many months and sometimes were shelved completely.
  • While the Bittorrent ecosystem was decentralized and extremely hard to censor, BitTorrent Inc — one of the few participants with real potential influence — was highly visible and felt exposed to legal repercussions of any of its actions
  • But in practice the only way to make any large-scale governance viable is to re-centralize power in a smaller number of deciders with some number of rules around how you can become and remain a decider
  • And this is the main conclusion — decentralization may be great for disruption, but if the experience of Bittorrent is anything to go by it is not at all clear that it has a role in whatever comes next. Blockchain architectures are great for unleashing unstoppable rule-breaking mobs, but we shouldn’t mistake the rule-breakers for the winners.
  • Bittorrent could have been eradicated by state intervention, but most states chose a lighter touch approach. The same is mostly true so far for crypto-currencies, but the scope is so much greater and time will tell at what point a state actor will feel compelled to intervene
  • The ‘winners’ created in the wake of Bittorrent disruption (Spotify and Netflix) shed any semblance of decentralization — it simply wasn’t necessary any more, and actually made things harder. But their success was the result of a paradigm shift where files were abstracted away.