Collection of recent crypto learnings 2: “Ethereum hit $10 billion in revenue faster than any other major software company besides Google”

Below are some thoughtful and entertaining crypto-related content since the last update

Ethereum hit $10 billion in revenue faster than any other major software company besides Google

Ethereum Revenue

Programmable, composable data structures (ie, tokens) are the “new computing primitive” that will usher in the next phase of the internet

We need an alternative. Crypto is the perfect marriage for AI since the transparent global human coordination that underpins the movement is something that can harness AI for good at global scale. Crowdfunding (with cash or with your GPU) the creation and fine tuning of open source models which anyone can audit in real time for biases or issues is the safest path forward in the accelerating world of AI.

Chris takes the same journey but he calls these phases Read, Write, and Own. The initial phase of the web, when the web browser arrived, was mostly a reading experience. Then in the early 2000s, the web became two-way and we could Read and Write. What Blockchain Networks have unlocked is the ability to own things on the web

The “big, long macro trend” is what’s important, not the “technology” of “passive investing” or “indexing”. American Boomers of the last 30 years think they are “smart” to Index, but their real smartness was to jump on board a trend fueled by US money printing combined with quantitative easing and globalism

The idea of Bitcoin, like the idea of Index funds is a clean “world view” that markets itself. It’s not the only crypto that does so. Once you do accept Bitcoin into your brain, part of your brain opens up to other cryptos: Eth, Solana, NFTs, Ordinals … maybe some combination of Crypto and AI like Tao.

My sense is that this new idea: Bitcoin, and this new demographic: Millenials are in for an epic bull run.
The BTC ETF will be the gateway drug for this. It will get the Boomers and GenXs so that they CAN participate in the transition. Most won’t. But enough will.
It’s an idea that will take over the next 20 years.

Friend.tech does ~$7M in annualized revenue from only ~500 DAUs. But you need to have an extremely high CLV for the economics to work.

He defines crypto as a meeting of “generative tech” (the creation of new things, users and markets) and “participatory capital formation” (individuals pooling money in new ways to create new types of businesses).

Cdixon on investing (he leads a16z’s Crypto Fund):

I used to think venture investing is 80% an intellectual test, 20% emotional test. Now I’d say it’s the reverse.
I’d say the same about my experiences as a startup founder. Probably true of many other long-term activities.

Giving up too early, being overly influenced by external sentiment, acting hastily, losing sight of fundamentals, getting too optimistic, getting too pessimistic, being overeager to do something when sometimes you just have to wait, other times waiting too long…. Etc etc :)

Every bull market in crypto has been kicked off by a new method of token distribution. Examples include:
* PoW chain proliferation—2013/2014
* ICOs—2017
* IEOs—2019
* Liquidity mining—2020
* NFT minting—2021
*

Some view this regression phenomenon as the foundational policy of the crypto space: “whatever is permitted by the protocol’s code and market structure is legitimate.” This viewpoint, while rarely expressed in such direct terms, is remarkably common among crypto users

Regression to the code erodes social norms, and this consequence accounts in large part for what repulses people from crypto. Even as protocols fulfill important social functions like affordable remittances and escape from inflationary regimes, “the space” appears to outsiders as greedy and riddled with scams. It is for this reason that crypto seems to stand apart from all prior human institutions

Token buyers will be to investors what bloggers/tweeters are to journalists:
Tokens will break down the barrier between professional investors and token buyers in the same way that the internet brought down the barrier between professional journalists and tweeters and bloggers.

Multi-chain developers have 10x-ed since 2015 and accelerated after 2018.
30% of devs have been working on 2+ chains for 3 years.
Most chains share deployers with Ethereum. Ethereum, @0xPolygonLabs, & @BNBChain cross-polinate the most frequently.
Large ecosystems have emerged for @0xPolygonLabs, @Optimism, @Solana, @NEARprotocol, @Cosmos, @Arbitrum, @BNBChain, and @avax

Treasuries are just staked US dollars (!)

In these cycles, bitcoin consistently outperformed altcoins in phase 1 of the upswing. In phase 2, altcoins substantially outperformed bitcoin. What’s interesting is that the magnitude of outperformance is so large that altcoins have outperformed bitcoin across the full length of both cycles

If attention is the core pricing factor, then what crypto enables is an infinite canvas to issue and trade assets that track attention. The broader pattern of “financializing attention” requires two of crypto’s most important properties to reach its natural end state: permissionlessness and composability.

The reason is that the transition from a gold-backed to fiat-backed system was comparable to a soft communist revolution, as the *visible* seizure of gold laid the groundwork for the *invisible* seizure of wealth via money printing.
And the classically trained judges at that time fully understood this. Justice McReynolds’ then-famous dissent denounced the ruling in the harshest terms, noting that the “Constitution is gone” and the “dollar…may be 30c tomorrow, 10c the next day, and 1c the day following”.

The most important takehome is that tokens are not equity, but are more similar to paid API keys. Nevertheless, they may represent a >1000X improvement in the time-to-liquidity and a >100X improvement in the size of the buyer base relative to traditional means for US technology financing — like a Kickstarter on steroids

Crypto is the modern version of the long emerging markets trade. As an industry, it will see the most relative capital inflows, budding innovation and has an innately global footprint. It provides a fiat currency debasement hedge (Bitcoin), new application networks akin to the internet (smart contract blockchains like Ethereum and Solana) and the fastest growing population. You can compare it to any individual sovereign, country or financial market and nothing beats it.

Our thesis at Variant is that the next generation of internet networks will turn users into owners—specifically asset owners. The internet enabled everyone to become a publisher, and similarly, crypto enables everyone to become an asset owner, and therefore, an investor. You don’t need capital to invest, you can invest your time or work by producing art, running machines, or doing physical work.

Ethereum is just a super useful thing – Ippolito

Podcast notes – Blockchain debate with Blockworks, Avichal (Electric), and Haseeb (Dragonfly)

Blockworks Host Jason (J)
Avichal (A) – Electric
Haseeb (H) – Dragonfly

Crypto narratives today
Haseeb – narrative exhaustion; resurgence of Defi 2.0 (Wonderland); game fi has slowed (Axie price falling); overuse of metaverse; L1 wars have stabilized; interoperability is exciting but not many tokens yet
Avichal – far enough in bull market that everyone’s exhausted, like early 2018; is it a top signal; so much activity in every subsector

H: Lots of activity in private / early stage, but not much movement in public / blue chip tokens
So much web3 chatter, but most of the top coins aren’t really web3
It’s not like 2018 (lots of bullshit got funded, floor fell out of market, market lost confidence)
We’re in a waiting game, what’s the next big thing?
Lots of exciting tech is coming in 1-2 years, like big studio games, zero knowledge

A: As a startup, the promise carries you for a few years, and then the real work begins
Wonderland type drama happens all the time in normal startups – but now it’s public and liquid and transparent much earlier

J: In web2, founder has all the equity, but it’s almost flipped in web3, where founders can’t really sell, but the early employees can and are more anon / have more freedom

A: For best founders, money doesn’t change them but shows who they really are – they just dial up their game. It’s an interesting character test. Like Vitalik, it’s mission driven

J: Money is amplification of character

H: Blockchains as cities thesis
Will ETH win everything?
If blockchains are networks, then one will be completely dominant
But blockchains are physically constrained by decentralization and blocksize
Best analogy is land
ETH is old, congested, improvement is slow, but all the money and status is there (NYC)
Scaling: Rollups (skyscrapers); Alt L1 (build another city)
Cities become differentiated – NYC vs LA vs Chicago
This model predicts a few things:
1. Power law distribution of cities / blockchains
2. Rollups are important but not complete solutions
3. Bridges are important as crypto grows (moving between cities)

A: Worked at Google / Facebook
Think about it as countries not cities (bigger cultural differences, more protectionism), but generally agree w/ Haseeb
TikTok can be huge, but so can Snapchat, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc
Free trade matters, maybe need a NATO
pmarca idea – world is moving to city-state model, away from nation-state; internet is fractured, people aggregating into tribal units that are more like Greek city-states
Are there 10 or 100 L1s?

H: markets generally are neutral; there are some axes (like cost, or privacy) where it does matter
Blockchains try to be a neutral substrate

A: Value capture is tied to L1, so maybe things evolve like Flow (gaming focused, more vertical solutions)
Will fragmentation happen at app layer, or L1 layer?

H: Ethereum doesn’t have a single culture now, NFT v Defi v web3
Balkanization will happen within L1s
Solana culture feels different – high performance, build the fastest thing, everyone makes money
But the same balkanization could happen too

J: Identity could get tied up in L1s, but your identity isn’t tied to AWS v Azure v other cloud services
Identity can shift quickly based on token performance

A: If you missed one chain’s pump, you’re motivated to find a new one, but once your net worth is tied to a chain, you’re more incentivized to identify with and stay there
If I can own a piece of the network, do I HAVE to become an evangelist?
Parallels with religion – there’s an “r factor” where the faster you grow, the more likely you can win

J: If you wanna make it in Hollywood, you go to LA, if you want money you go to NYC
AMMs / lending / blue chip apps will be utilities on each L1

A: Tribes have financial incentive to improve L1, so will build apps on top of them
Nationalism is a good comparison – each nation competes with each other, and wants to support their local economies and companies

H: rarely invests in L1s now, hard to differentiate
In 2017-18, crypto was 95% religion, not many real use cases
Now you have real use cases decided by technical differences of scalability and cost and speed
Becoming less about religion, more about needs

A: At 2B crypto users, we may need a lot more L1s, maybe just a period of consolidation now. It’s 5-7 blue chip L1s today, but could it become 50-70?
Also apps choose chains based on # of users too – not just optimizing tech

H: Maybe invest in Atom / Cosmos Hub to get exposure to the long tail of L1s

J: We’re agreeing on a multichain future, and need bridges to connect the chains
Bridges are harder to build than we expected

A: Anti-bridges, if 99% of users aren’t in crypto yet, you don’t want inter-op, you wanna build your own network effects
Bridges give liquidity + some users, but none of that is really sticky
Better off acquiring new users
FB doesn’t want to get MySpace users, but get new users / new demos (like college students)
Solana wasn’t EVM compatible, wasn’t trying to get ETH users, attracting different type of users / money

H: Very pro-bridge
Solana got all its users and liquidity from FTX – which was de facto a bridge
Considers Binance / FTX bridges too – way to move assets across chains
Users don’t care if bridges are centralized or decentralized
Every social network imports email graphs – that was top of funnel – which is equivalent to Ethereum in crypto today. It’s the starting point, there was an existing graph
New users are unlikely to start with Near, most likely to show up on Coinbase and Metamask

A: Point of entry into crypto is FTX / Binance / Coinbase
Bridge technical challenges will get solved
Back to nations analogy, you want capital controls / protect your native users and companies from foreign competitors
More bullish centralized bridges (like Opensea, FTX, etc, bridges broadly defined) over decentralized bridges

H: Avalanche took off because they had a good bridge
Blockchains are economies, and amount of capital really matters
Cross chain messaging is important but central bridges won’t allow that (want to control the info flow) – thus decentralized bridges are useful for that (in addition to moving capital)

J: Sometimes crypto has reverse network effects – more users = more cost and blockchains can slow down

A: R-factor and evangelism create more / less network effects
EVM is javascript of crypto
Tooling and developer network fx
Spectrum of network fx – some are strong (eg, evangelism, being anti-other chains), others are weak – wonder how this will correlate with market structure and outcomes