A must read if you want to understand the fundamental innovation of bitcoin: “Bitcoin is time”

I read this essay every few months and every few months my mind is blown again:

In other words, the diffi­culty-adjust­ment is about keeping a constant time, not a constant level of security, diffi­culty, or energy expen­di­ture. This is ingenious because good money has to be costly in time, not energy. Linking money to energy alone is not suffi­cient to produce absolute scarcity since every improve­ment in energy gener­a­tion would allow us to create more money. Time is the only thing we will never be able to make more of. It is The Ultimate Resource, as Julian Simon points out. This makes Bitcoin the ultimate form of money because its issuance is directly linked to the ultimate resource of our universe: time

from Bitcoin is time by Gigi

Podcast notes – Robert Waldinger, What makes a good life (TED talk on Harvard study of adult development)

 

Millennial survey – 80+% said major life goal was to get rich, 50% said to become famous

What if we could watch lives unfold as they actually happen?
“Harvard study of adult development” – tracked 724 men for 75 years

60 of those men are still alive and still participating in study – most in 90s
Now they have 2000+ children

First group started as Harvard sophomores – most served in WW2
Second group were group of boys from Boston’s most troubled neighborhoods

All entered the study as teenagers

One became president of the US

Every 2 years, research staff does surveys of the participants
Draw blood, scan brains, talk to their children, videotape them talking to their wives

What’s been learned?
Clearest message: Good relationships keep us happier and healthier

Relationship lessons
1. Social connections are really good for us – family, friends, community; loneliness is toxic – they’re less happy, their brain functions and health decline sooner
2. It’s not quantity but quality of closest relationships that matter – high conflict marriages are very bad for health, perhaps even worse than divorce
3. Good relationships protect not only our bodies but our brains – secure attachments at age 80, those brains and memories stay sharper for longer

Predictors at age 50 of longevity – not health, but “how satisfied were they in their relationships” – these became the healthiest at age 80

Relationships don’t have to be smooth – but need to be able to count on each other through tough times

Those happiest in retirement – actively replaced workmates with new playmates

People who far best are those who lean into relationships – family, friends, community

Twain quote: “There isn’t time – so brief is life – for bickerings, apologies, heartburnings, callings to account. there is only time for loving – & but an instant, so to speak, for that.”

Podcast notes – Sam Bankman Fried (FTX and Alameda founder) on Invest like the Best

SBF – founder of Alameda Research, FTX, before that at Jane Street, one of world’s youngest billys

What’s your Truth North?
Day to day – efficient markets, does the risk engine work, does product design make sense (eg, equity markets currently are not 24/7, but it shouldn’t be that way, it’s more a historical artifact)
More generally – philanthropy (effective altruism / utilitarianism), how can I maximize my positive impact on the world

Lots of organizations having lasting impact on long-run future of world, the trillions of people to come after us
What’s become clear is society has no fucking clue what to do about pandemics – not restricted to just one country – even the countries thought to do well initially, economies stalled out, and not clear path forward
What would it have taken for us to be in a much better place?
1. Took a year after covid hit to begin distributing vaccine – could have had it in 2 months
2. Early detection systems, better vaccine production systems, reduced regulatory time for testing / approval

How much is society putting in to prepare better for next pandemic?
“I don’t know…zero?”
Doing things to solve this can save tens of trillions of dollars, and have enormous impact

What’s perfect state of markets?
Start with latency – how low does it need to be to capture most of economic value – as close as possible to release rate of new economic information
Milliseconds is probably enough
NYSE is milliseconds, but then it’s closed overnight, and on weekends and holidays – “which is sort of insane”
Always open is pretty important

Another easy win: Order books should be free and publicly available
That’s whole purpose of exchanges – so why hide it, except for people paying $50M/year – trading firms are paying it
Crypto exchanges – fees come from transactions
Equity exchanges – service is mostly a commodity, so only proprietary stuff is their data
Amount of intermediation is insane – mobile app, clearance custody, prime brokers, equity exchanges – all these intermediaries take fees, slow things down, add tape
Innovation slows down too – if exchange wants to move 24/7, needs everyone else to change too, “weakest link component”

Reasonable trading fee is 1 or a few bps (basis points) – larger fees mean less efficient pricing, less liquidity, less overall economic activity – total net fees not just matching engine fees

Crypto represents a migration to better end state – always on, more transparent, globally accessible

State of fairness in crypto markets today
-most important thing is transparency about transparency (everyone agrees what market structure looks like)
-having a level playing field to start with (it’s still a total mess, but less so than 3 years ago)
-eg in 2017 lots of Japanese got excited about bitcoin, but bitcoin price in Japan was a lot higher than rest of world (10% arbitrage opportunity) – exact opposite of inefficient market
-today these arbs still exist – eg, Coinbase trading higher than Gemini for weeks at a time due to flows – driven by lack of liquidity, idiosyncrasies with some assets (eg, Tether), lack of integration with fiat / banking

How to solve a lot of this?
“Stablecoins” – useful to move within the crypto system
eg, USDC – can move 24/7, fast and on blockchain, remove reliance on wire transfers

How much fiat inflow has actually gone into space?
Higher bound – Crypto market cap = $2.5 trillion (this was an old podcast)
Lower bound – $100B of stablecoins outstanding
Probably $400-500B in actual fiat has invested (20-25% of total market cap)

What will change the ratio – most financial institutions are PLANNING to buy bitcoin at some point – they now have mandates to get involved, but they all say “they’re not ready yet”
Should materialize in next few years
Probably the ratio will get closer to one (of actual fiat inflow to total market cap)

Huge demand for good infrastructure in crypto – exchanges still crashing during busy times

When SBF first entering crypto, hardest part of the crypto trade was the wire transfer
Lots of inefficiencies in traditional financial infra – wire to Nigeria is 10%, credit card fees are 3%
Crypto rails can help fix this – eg, all social data posted immediately on-chain, means a tweet can immediately be liked on Facebook, or a TikTok video can be instantly published to Instagram

If you’re in crypto and you’re not thinking extremely hard about regulation and compliance – you’re making a huge mistake

Must remain dynamic / flexible in long-term planning, to adapt to constantly changing environment

Crypto trades almost as much as US equity ($200B in global daily volume) – but US itself is far behind
Crypto is totally new asset class, born 5 years ago, and now is almost as large as the largest asset classes

Reasonable to find strategic parts of ecosystem to put bulk of regulations – eg, any centralized exchanges, or fiat-to-crypto conversion points
“Take steps in right direction” to protect consumers, detect financial crimes – will address most of large points of concerns, and help crypto ecosystem to thrive

There will be stable coins in world – if US bans them, then it will go to EUR or CNY

Why are derivatives so important for markets?
-in every asset class, there’s more derivatives trading volume – if you don’t need physical delivery, derivatives are more economically efficient
-average trade doesn’t require to get the actual thing (eg, a stock, or gold, or oil)
-so it requires less assets on balance sheets, more efficient markets, lowers capital requirements and transaction costs

What competitive differentiation among exchanges
-cross-margining (eg, FTX allows collateral to applies across multiple assets / trades)

Thoughts on paid acquisition
-most FTX users came from Twitter, from user memes and endorsements
-don’t buy FB / Google ads
-for hardcore traders, product is what drives it
-for new / casual traders, name recognition matters “and we’re way behind on that” (compared to Binance or Coinbase)
-want not just recognition of FTX the name, but create a powerful association
-only a few endorsements matter – should be extremely choosy

Thoughts on user generated asset era
-are books UGC? Sort of, but historically the gatekeepers are bookstores and publishing houses – it’s author UGC, but with bottlenecks and gate keeping
-before, 7 asset managers drove equity markets, now it’s social media and asking friends – Tesla is great example, people taking choices into their own hands
-NFTs are UGC, direct to consumer
-tokens / token economies are flourishing around the world, but not in the US due to regulations
-ultimately it’s good, more efficient markets, more dis-intermediation, and more curation will emerge naturally

Right now, there should be many Layer 1 blockchains, competition among them, to see what emerges
What’s end game that matters the most? 1 billion users using a chain, trillions of dollars using a chain
To get there, need millions of TPS (transactions per second)
You want to maximize composability, even across shards
If you don’t get there, you won’t be primary player to facilitate all the activity that’s required

5-10 TPS is not enough to be general purpose medium, but it DOES allow you to move bitcoin around – “has potentially a large role in the world” – it’s a different thing from ETH or Solana

Most economically efficient thing is single centralized server
Decentralized blockchains have maybe 10K servers? Will always be less efficient
Blockchains will be connection layers – across more efficient / centralized services

What he thinks he’s good at:
number of concepts he can hold in his head, and reason about
make sure not to lose the important threads
-maybe relatively better RAM (flexibility)
-not so good at long-term storage of info and facts

His wealth / fame has changed how people interact with him, but not huge change in his day-to-day life

All the expected value is in the upside tails not in the median outcomes, and you should take that seriously – often the right path is the one that might fail
As world speeds up and becomes wackier, this becomes more and more important
Acknowledge things that sound crazy and unlikely may not play out that way

When he started FTX, he was most optimistic on his team about success – thought it was 20%, team even more pessimistic
But even he was way under-estimating the upside
Straightforward EV analysis was the correct one

Most kindest thing anyone’s done for him: lot of people in effective altruism community have been dedicated and selfless, making personal sacrifices to seek the altruistic upside

Podcast notes – Pat Flynn, If I Was Starting a YouTube Channel Today

Caleb (co-host)
-Posted first vid in 2013, about a random piece of technology, played around for a few years, wasn’t until he made consistent videos that he learned how to grow it
-Works closely with Pat, it’s a side biz
-General advice: The people who click your videos will be interested in the topic, they want to be there – don’t worry about people who don’t care or aren’t interested

You don’t need a fancy camera

You don’t need a huge elaborate spectacle to get a lot of views (eg, Mr Beast)

Everyone wants the magical 1M subs, but you can have a solid business in 10K+ subs range

First thing to start a YT channel – Don’t start recording right away
First, figure out who you’re creating videos for – YT will help connect you to those people!

Pat Flynn – entrepreneurship was his niche, started really focusing on it in 2018
But even entrepreneurship is too broad, so many sub topics – he gets a “come and go” audience
You want a “come and stay” audience

My YouTube channel is different because ________
(Fill in that blank)

Follow other channels and watch videos in your niche – find out what viewers like and dislike
Read the comments for research
Study the engagement graph to know what parts people watch the most and least

“If you help YouTube succeed, they will help YOU succeed”
Make “click and stick” videos – it’s all about engagement and watch time – it’s legit-bait not clickbait

YouTube knows you better than you know you

**START WITH THE TITLE** – think about the title first, then create video to support the title
Write 5 titles, and pick your favorite
If you can’t get a good title, move on to a different video
Faces generally do better – a reaction face, surprise face – especially your own face once you have somewhat of a following

Have different text in thumbnail graphic vs actual video title
These text must grab their attention!

SEO / search is lowest source of views on YT – highest is BROWSE and SUGGESTED

Thumbnail is probably most important thing – Mr. Beast at summit spent an entire talk about thumbnails, different colors and versions

Most views should come from Browse / Suggested / Search – because that’s new viewers, that’s growth

So you got people to click – now how do you guarantee they’ll stick around?
Need a good HOOK to get them to stay watching – watch Mr Beast, immediately you’re pulled into the world and know what’s going to happen
75% retention at beginning (after 30s) is good – all about the hook

“When we cringe, we learn” – so much cringe looking at your old videos, but that’s how you get better

Retention tips
-add chapter marks / bookmarks so people can jump to where they want, also helps with search results
-story – tell them what’s at stake
-add B-roll – quick transitions, variety

1K subs / 4K hours watch time unlocks monetization
Affiliate marketing is great way to get started

Pat’s been on YT since 2009 – so when he creates a new channel today it can grow quickly – but don’t compare yourself to that

Make videos about products you like, because those brands will pay attention
Timing is important – being first product review video is really helpful

Intro yourself and your channel throughout the video – don’t just rely on a big slot at the beginning

Podcast notes – Peter Zeihan (global geopolitical analyst) – Meb Faber show

Peter Zeihan – geopolitical expert, author of new book “The end of the world is just the beginning” (his 4th book)

Lives in Denver

FIRST THEME: De-globalization – US changed world system after WW2 – used navy to patrol global oceans to enable global trade, IF you let us manage your security policy, “guns for butter”, but now US is pulling back from this

SECOND THEME: De-population – urbanization > fewer kids; baby bust so entrenched that most major economies have shrinking demographics now, passed point of return in 90s-00s; running out of workers, labor shortage

**1980-2015 we were in perfect global moment – Cold War winding down, US protecting oceans, global trade growing
But now heading into a fundamentally new – and more uncertain and chaotic – age because of the above 2 themes

Most models of economic growth were based on rising population – but that’s no longer a reality for most countries

**British took 7 generations to modernize, US took 5, China took just 1 – because each learns from the prior

But China also condensed all that economic activity and growth into one demographic generation too – precipitous decline in birthrates
Beijing and Shanghai have lowest birth rates of any urban center in all of human history

Developed world:
US, New Zealand, France have relatively good demographics
China, Japan, Russia have bad demographics

Developing world:
**Argentina, Mexico have good demographics

Once you urbanize, child-raising costs are very high, hard to subsidize this
-Russia tried in 2000s to give cash prizes to every woman with 2nd, 3rd child – but a lot of women would have children and then leave them at the orphanage, now millions of orphaned kids
-Swedes gave 6 months paid leave per baby, but it led to no employer willing to hire women under 35yo

Chairman Xi has stronger cult of personality than Mao
No advisor wants to provide him any information now, too afraid
Putin lied to Xi about Ukraine, none of Xi’s advisors were willing to tell him the truth, and Xi was surprised by Russia’s subsequent invasion
Xi has removed all future government leadership talent because of purges and extreme control
China is preparing for future where economic growth isn’t basis for legitimacy, but rather nationalism – you can eat as long as you’re loyal to party
Covid lockdowns because the homegrown vaccine doesn’t really work
Shut off phosphate exports – because of internal concerns about food security (Russia stopped potash exports, both are key fertilizers)
“This is a national collapse issue, not a recession issue”

How to reduce these risks as a nation-state
-increase diversity of suppliers
-**shift from “just in time” to “just in case”

Global food shortage going to begin Q4 of this year
-already too late for this year’s crop yields
-so tightly integrated / mutually dependent that when you have break in one link, the chain breaks

**Peter believes we’ll lose 1B people because of de-globalization and ongoing food shortages

Ukraine is just one step in many for Russian expansion to ensure its own geopolitical survival
Russia has failed tactically in war – will lose if they face US armed forces – which leaves nukes as only remaining option
Must kill Russian military entirely in Ukraine – otherwise Russia will eventually invade NATO countries and force US into war
Russia has more guns, tanks, people – will eventually rollover Ukraine if Ukraine + allies can’t win by summer

Germans are trying to figure out how to live without Russian energy supplies, seems only nuclear power will enable that in a short time frame

For China to invade Taiwan, scale of casualties will be 5x greater than Russia invading Ukraine (because water = moat)
China actually doing less business with Russia since Ukraine invasion started
China would be more hurt by sanctions (than Russia) if they did invade Taiwan

Most non-consensus belief:
Peter believes inflation today is high, but it will actually be the LOWEST it’ll be for the next 5 years (!)

What he’s changed his mind about:
Shale revolution has become a lot more economically viable than he thought, even though he was initially more optimistic than most

Why Russian ruble is doing well even after invasion?
Government forced every Russian exporter to put 80% of earnings back into ruble – helping stabilize the ruble
Spending all of their foreign currency to strengthen the ruble
“Starvation diet in the long run”

What countries will do well in this new world?

France – see EU as political project not economic one – if EU suffers breakdown, France never fully integrated their economy (as much as say Germany), won’t suffer as much if EU ends

Argentina – second best geography after US, self sufficient in most energy and all food needs
Despite disastrous domestic management, they’ve muddled along, and they’re used to disorder, will do fine in this more disordered global system
WW1 – Argentina was 4th richest country in the world

Where does Peter get his info?
Local news sources have best info on what’s going on, but very time consuming
Among world media sources, Al-Jazeera global news is very good (Mideast news is very biased)