Podcast notes – Peter Zeihan (global geopolitical analyst) – Meb Faber show

Peter Zeihan – geopolitical expert, author of new book “The end of the world is just the beginning” (his 4th book)

Lives in Denver

FIRST THEME: De-globalization – US changed world system after WW2 – used navy to patrol global oceans to enable global trade, IF you let us manage your security policy, “guns for butter”, but now US is pulling back from this

SECOND THEME: De-population – urbanization > fewer kids; baby bust so entrenched that most major economies have shrinking demographics now, passed point of return in 90s-00s; running out of workers, labor shortage

**1980-2015 we were in perfect global moment – Cold War winding down, US protecting oceans, global trade growing
But now heading into a fundamentally new – and more uncertain and chaotic – age because of the above 2 themes

Most models of economic growth were based on rising population – but that’s no longer a reality for most countries

**British took 7 generations to modernize, US took 5, China took just 1 – because each learns from the prior

But China also condensed all that economic activity and growth into one demographic generation too – precipitous decline in birthrates
Beijing and Shanghai have lowest birth rates of any urban center in all of human history

Developed world:
US, New Zealand, France have relatively good demographics
China, Japan, Russia have bad demographics

Developing world:
**Argentina, Mexico have good demographics

Once you urbanize, child-raising costs are very high, hard to subsidize this
-Russia tried in 2000s to give cash prizes to every woman with 2nd, 3rd child – but a lot of women would have children and then leave them at the orphanage, now millions of orphaned kids
-Swedes gave 6 months paid leave per baby, but it led to no employer willing to hire women under 35yo

Chairman Xi has stronger cult of personality than Mao
No advisor wants to provide him any information now, too afraid
Putin lied to Xi about Ukraine, none of Xi’s advisors were willing to tell him the truth, and Xi was surprised by Russia’s subsequent invasion
Xi has removed all future government leadership talent because of purges and extreme control
China is preparing for future where economic growth isn’t basis for legitimacy, but rather nationalism – you can eat as long as you’re loyal to party
Covid lockdowns because the homegrown vaccine doesn’t really work
Shut off phosphate exports – because of internal concerns about food security (Russia stopped potash exports, both are key fertilizers)
“This is a national collapse issue, not a recession issue”

How to reduce these risks as a nation-state
-increase diversity of suppliers
-**shift from “just in time” to “just in case”

Global food shortage going to begin Q4 of this year
-already too late for this year’s crop yields
-so tightly integrated / mutually dependent that when you have break in one link, the chain breaks

**Peter believes we’ll lose 1B people because of de-globalization and ongoing food shortages

Ukraine is just one step in many for Russian expansion to ensure its own geopolitical survival
Russia has failed tactically in war – will lose if they face US armed forces – which leaves nukes as only remaining option
Must kill Russian military entirely in Ukraine – otherwise Russia will eventually invade NATO countries and force US into war
Russia has more guns, tanks, people – will eventually rollover Ukraine if Ukraine + allies can’t win by summer

Germans are trying to figure out how to live without Russian energy supplies, seems only nuclear power will enable that in a short time frame

For China to invade Taiwan, scale of casualties will be 5x greater than Russia invading Ukraine (because water = moat)
China actually doing less business with Russia since Ukraine invasion started
China would be more hurt by sanctions (than Russia) if they did invade Taiwan

Most non-consensus belief:
Peter believes inflation today is high, but it will actually be the LOWEST it’ll be for the next 5 years (!)

What he’s changed his mind about:
Shale revolution has become a lot more economically viable than he thought, even though he was initially more optimistic than most

Why Russian ruble is doing well even after invasion?
Government forced every Russian exporter to put 80% of earnings back into ruble – helping stabilize the ruble
Spending all of their foreign currency to strengthen the ruble
“Starvation diet in the long run”

What countries will do well in this new world?

France – see EU as political project not economic one – if EU suffers breakdown, France never fully integrated their economy (as much as say Germany), won’t suffer as much if EU ends

Argentina – second best geography after US, self sufficient in most energy and all food needs
Despite disastrous domestic management, they’ve muddled along, and they’re used to disorder, will do fine in this more disordered global system
WW1 – Argentina was 4th richest country in the world

Where does Peter get his info?
Local news sources have best info on what’s going on, but very time consuming
Among world media sources, Al-Jazeera global news is very good (Mideast news is very biased)

Podcast notes – All In on Russia-Ukraine war – Sacks, Chamath, Jason, Friedberg

David Sacks – DS
Jason Calacanis – JC
Chamath – CP
David Friedberg – DF

DS:
Putin thought it would be a cakewalk, but resistance has been fierce. Amazing leadership, Western support
Dangerous crossroads, so much variance in outcomes
Lindsay Graham called for Putin’s ouster / assassination
NATO decided against imposing no-fly zone over Ukraine – effectively going to war
Advocating for not getting US more involved

DF:
Concerned not about US but its NATO allies getting involved, and then Article 5 collective defense obligates US to get involved
Franz Ferdinand moment
Nuclear reactor is like a temple on earth to God, different level of risk / extinction

DS:
Nuclear power plant attack may be mis-reporting by mainstream media
Confirmed no radiation, no explosion – there’s a lot of disinformation, pulling us into war

JC:
Crazy behavior by Russian troops, Putin to even seize the power plant

CP:
Adversity makes for strange bedfellows
Zelensky is truly patriotic
World is learning a different kind of warfare
We’re at economic war with Russia
We’re willing to put economic collateral at risk to win
Lots of global and American companies are pulling out, restricting Russia

DF:
Are we rushing into war without an exit strategy?
Lukoil was worth $60B and now worth zero, 65% of shares are held by American funds and investors

CP:
That’s a red herring
It’s not that much equity value – it’s not trillions of dollars

DF:
What about intermediaries / supply chain defaults and failures?
Russia + Ukraine = 25% of global wheat exports = lots of consumers depend on it

JC:
It’s tragic, but we need to create pain and suffering so Putin will change

DF:
Have we really done the calculus?
Economic war in short period of time – what are the consequences? How do we feed those dependent on the wheat supply?

CP:
We’re teetering towards recession
When energy prices spike 50%, we always enter recession
Government will need to be more accommodating
We’ll find a way to subsidize lower commodity prices – but will drive debt + deficits
Biden added new sanctions today to Russian crude

DS:
We’re on escalatory path here
Germans giving Ukraine missiles
We’re not in war yet, not a binary thinker
During Cold War, containment was to prevent communism, but simultaneously we wouldn’t challenge those countries that were already communist
Biden and Putin remember the Cold War
Biden re-iterated during SOTU that we wouldn’t get militarily involved
No matter what Biden does, Republicans and Fox will denounce him for weakness
What’s the end game? Our domestic dynamic and social media and cable news pushes us into escalation and WW3
Who are the grown ups?

CP:
Economic sanctions will continue to ratchet up
Only end game is regime change, Putin is only left with detente / retreat
Options now:
-Ukraine defends itself
-Russia wins
-Peace treaty, keep at current lines
Germany undid 40 years of policy, now re-arming plus investing in domestic energy

JC:
It’s terrifying for Europe as this threat is so close by, like Central America for us
Feels like no exit, Putin has pride + nuclear weapons

DS:
Russia said redline, no way Georgia / Ukraine joining NATO
Russia thinking: we’re about to have pro Western ruler in Ukraine, we’ll lose our main naval base by Black Sea and replaced by NATO base – not going to happen
Russia been saying this since 2008
Even if it’s a pretext, it still would have been good to explicitly take NATO expansion off the table
George HW Bush – great foreign policy president – thought Cheney / Rumsfeld didn’t listen, too aggressive, iron ass diplomacy

JC:
Has Putin overplayed his hand?

DF:
Putin can only keep plowing forward

CP:
Half Russia economy is exports, $500B-1T
World banks can print that money to compensate

JC:
Great decoupling is upon us

CP:
Historically economic sanctions aren’t enough, eventually get pulled into military battle
One real asset that is global and universal is financial payments infra
You can cripple a country / entity when you blacklist them from this infra
We haven’t explored this in full until now
Especially in airlines + oil

JC:
Take away your seat at the table
Netflix, Google, Apple pulling out
Russians turning off other internet services

CP:
Japan, Europe, Canada, America can support $5-7T in subsidies, shut off Russian exports for 5-10 years

DS:
What are our objectives?
Don’t think regime change is necessary – it’s cringe
US has not successfully done regime change
Goal should be ceasefire
Putin miscalculated resolve of Zelensky + the West

JC:
Putin lost info war
First meme war

CP:
Russian GDP has decayed 35% in last decade, it’s contracting

Paused listening about 3/5 of way through