This tweet and this blog: “In a post truth world pay attention to the men proximate to the money printers”

The tweet, copying a few bits: https://x.com/goodalexander/status/1825296389317775501

Thus Bloomberg’s monopoly is not a tech monopoly. Its software is mediocre. It is an access monopoly, which is a direct side effect of the great ongoing state-corporate merger that’s hyper-accelerated since the late 1980s.Politics is – of course, at the center of a political economy. And it pays to be on the side of the aisle that gives you the best access (which is the left wing).

This similarly explains why George Soros became a left-wing meme lord post 1993. His capital base simply got too big and the only way to move size was in government markets. Cryptocurrency is inherently a right wing asset class because it’s constantly noting the elephant in the room (that there’s too much debt, and it won’t ever be paid back). As such, it cripples itself in terms of institutional adoption so it’s a bit of a miracle that there are even ETFs.

Everyone has convinced themselves there’s a ton of election risk regarding cryptocurrency. But — because Bloomberg, Soros, Blackrock and the left wing consortium are on the forefront of ‘institutional adoption’ – I simply don’t think that’s the case. Not for BTC, and not for ETH.

In a post truth world pay attention to the men proximate to the money printers. Assume they are acting on marching orders that are somewhat consistent. Buy crypto because you’re allowed to. Keep your Bloomberg terminal so you can buy more intraday when they invent a crisis to start easing.

…and his blog is great too! https://goodalexander.com/

Recent startup, tech, AI, crypto learnings: “The user is never wrong” — Larry Page

Here’s the last one.

The average return on a token that paid for media space on DexScreener was -50% over only a 24 hour period.
Heuristic: If someone is paying cash to make sure I see a token, it’s so they can dump on me if I’m stupid enough to pay attention.

Close to 3/4 of startups work fully remote — in Alliance DAO

Aggregations of opinion polls in the 1960s have shown approval of the moon landing was consistently lower than disapproval. One poll of astronomers showed a majority against the mission. Even President Kennedy’s own head of Science Advisory Committee – Jerome Wiesner – opposed a manned mission, releasing a critical report on the notion.
Popular opposition isn’t something you often hear about regarding the Apollo program. It is conveniently missing from America’s collective memory, in lieu of a tale of collective patriotic triumph. A narrative that pleases Democrats as an example of successful big public programs and Republicans, as a triumph of the capitalist west against the communist east.
47% said it was worth it a decade later, in 1979 and it would take 20 years for amnesia to set it and this number to reach 77% in 1989.

There are just 21 million #bitcoin after all… How scarce that number. There are something like 59 million millionaires in the world (not enough for all of them to hold even 0.36 BTC).

Josh Kopelman: VC is anti network fx. The more you invest the harder to help them

5 levels to AGI according to OpenAI:
1. Chatbots
2. Reasoners
3. Agents
4. Innovators
5. Organizations

Level 3 is when the AI models begin to develop the ability to create content or perform actions without human input, or at least at the general direction of humans. Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO has previously hinted that GPT-5 might be an agent-based AI system.

@feketegy
This is exactly my thought too, think of programming mainframes in FORTRAN or COBOL in the 70s then PCs with ASM and C in the 90s and now LLMs plugs into many languages giving context to code bases where there were none before.

The above figures are clear: There is almost no persistence in CEO performance. The observed number of CEOs in each category is indistinguishable from what we would expect if the process were entirely random

44% of Bitcoin nodes are currently at the chain tip (fully synced with the network), with an additional 48% synced within 5 blocks of the chain tip, resulting in an enormous 92.8% are synced within 5 blocks. Only 7.2% of nodes are more than 5 blocks behind.

While we kept plodding on the “pure dual-core”, Intel, still smarting from the x64 defeat just slapped two 1x cores together, did some smart interconnects, & marketed it as “dual core”. Joke at AMD was that Intel’s marketing budget was > our R&D (true fact). Customers ate it up.

We did launch a “true” dual core, but nobody cared. By then Intel’s “fake” dual core already had AR/PR love. We then started working on a “true” quad core, but AGAIN, Intel just slapped 2 dual cores together & called it a quad-core. How did we miss that playbook?!

Today ‘summarise this document’ is AI, and you need a cloud LLM that costs $20/month, but tomorrow the OS will do that for free. ‘AI is whatever doesn’t work yet.’

power is becoming the main constraint. US electricity production has barely grown in a decade
– the US could solve this with natural gas. we have abundant supply and could build out capacity fast (my note: i wonder if bitcoin miners can help this?)

algorithmic secrets are worth 10x+ more compute. we’re leaking these constantly
– model weights will be critical to protect too. stealing these could let others instantly catch up

Looking at the spending behaviour of long-term holders, it can be seen that although the spent volume by these players constitutes only 4%-8% of the total volume, the profits realized from this spending typically account for 30%-40% of cumulative profits realized over bull markets.

Every Wednesday morning, Amazon’s executive team gets together and goes through 400-500 metrics that represents the current state of Amazon’s various businesses. The meeting lasts 60 minutes, except for when it’s the holiday shopping season, in which case they sit together for 90 minutes. Amazon’s leadership meets for the Weekly Business Review every week, without fail, even when the CEO or CFO isn’t present. They’ve been doing this since the early 2000s.

The Amazon-style WBR is designed to answer three questions:
What did our customers experience last week?
How did our business do last week?
Are we on track to hit targets?

It is easy to trade social capital for financial capital. But while you can cloak yourself in blue-chip designers all you like to impress your fellow financiers, it is extremely hard to trade financial capital for social capital.
You’ve seen this with every washed-up celebrity you know: when the coolest people become rich, even they can’t remain cool.

Larry Page: the user is never wrong

Empower your employees to build their social presence.Tap into those audiences for key company announcements.Build a culture around this so that net new employees can replenish the distribution when people inevitably leave.

Reason Google took so long to build cloud service is because it was lower margin than ads. No internal incentives. Same reason Amazon did it so quickly — higher margin than retail, “your margin is my opportunity”

All this to say that I’ve shifted my thoughts from “crypto and web3 will absorb tradfi” to “crypto and web3 serve as the base layer for AI”
Web3 isn’t our internet… it will belong to the machines

Laffont / Coatue:
$100T in CPU / PC infra investment
Believes all this will be replaced by $100T or more in GPU infra investment — but quantum will be very small part of it

China has commenced operation of the world’s first fourth-generation nuclear reactor, for which China asserts it developed some 90 percent of the technology.
Overall, analysts assess that China likely stands 10 to 15 years ahead of the United States in its ability to deploy fourth-generation nuclear reactors at scale

1) Many international individuals decide to start their company in the US (for example Snowflake was founded by 3 French people but it is an American company) as there are fewer regulations (Europe is very complicated given different states have different laws)
2) Source of Capital: the US has an amazing venture capital environment with investors who can act quickly and are willing to lose capital. In Europe, raising capital is much harder and lengthy

In 5 years, it’ll seem bizarre that we ever allowed anyone to email or text or call us AND the norm was to at least think about replying to them. Being reachable 24/7 by anyone and for anything will have been a blip in time, an absurd anomaly in the long arc of the hyperconnected digital age.

This gave those labels a lot of power over Spotify, but not all the labels, just three of them. Universal, Warner and Sony, the Big Three, control more than 70% of all music recordings, and more than 60% of all music compositions. These three companies are remarkably inbred. Their execs routine hop from one to the other, and they regularly cross-license samples and other rights to each other.

As we pored over the code, we found that, although there were a few human women on the site, more than 11 million interactions logged in the database were between human men and female bots. And the men had to pay for every single message they sent. For most of their millions of users, Ashley Madison affairs were entirely a fantasy built out of threadbare chatbot pick-up lines like “how r u?” or “whats up?”

Value of information is the amount of surprise — information theory

Crypto’s trends from the ICO boom; to NFT summer; to socialFi, to memecoining, show me that people like to do their own research, get some sense of market advantage and then buy in size.

This past week we had one of the most bullish signals for the crypto industries with the SEC dropping its case against ConsenSys, alongside an imminent launch of the $ETH ETF. Despite this, $ETH has drawn down 12% from local highs, with majority of altcoins down anywhere from 10-50% in the past week when I first expressed this view.

Crypto-native positioning is more relevant for alts, where liquidity and thinner and % of participant that is crypto-native is higher. For $BTC and $ETH, the consideration is more PvE in nature vs PvP, and my believe are these two are still flag-bearers for the market, especially given the decimation in TOTAL3.

Incredible report on the macro-political implications of Bitcoin, especially wrt US-China relations

Original source here: https://www.btcpolicy.org/articles/great-power-network-competition-bitcoin

It was published in October 2023 but I hadn’t read it until recently.

Sharing my favorite excerpts here, I use // when appending comments

Network power consists in the ability of a state to exercise surveillance and chokepoint controls
over a global network. For example, signals intelligence collection on global communications, suspicious activity reports on banking transactions, and end-user inspections on semiconductor technology are all forms of surveillance power from which the U.S. derives immense geopolitical advantage.

// reminds me a bit of Balaji’s Sovereign States thesis… digital networks gradually gaining power and autonomy

namely the “frenemy” relationship that previously obtained between financial capital (dominated by the G7), energy/commodities (dominated by OPEC+), and goods production (dominated by China)

// energy/commodities seems more complicated than just OPEC dominance given US shale growth and China & Brazil dominance in certain key categories

The old playbook of economic coercion and network exclusion may work for minor powers, but it certainly isn’t going suffice (and may even backfire) in an era of great power competition. Note that China’s geoeconomic allies across OPEC and Russia (and the expanded BRICS) dominate the oil market, most commodities trade, and are increasingly at the center of global value chains.

Social Security started drawing down trust fund reserves (USTs) for the first time in 2021, with a projected depletion by 2034

// if 2034 is accurate, that’s highly concerning… and also why I told my mom to start taking distributions as soon as she was able

An IMF study found that “an individual in the 75th percentile of wealth distribution who invested $1 in 2004 would have yielded $1.50 by the end of 2015—a return of 50 percent. A person in the top
0.1 percent would have yielded $2.40 on the same invested dollar—a return of 140 percent.”

A leaked analysis by the Office of Naval Intelligence showed that “China is the world’s leading shipbuilder by a large margin”, controlling “~40% of global commercial shipbuilding market” with a
shipbuilding capacity 232 times greater than the U.S.

China and a handful of other nations now own over $12 trillion in U.S. equities, up from $2 trillion in 2010

// certainly any attack on the US would include crashing financial markets, even a 20% drop in stock prices would lead to rising panic and societal discontent… much less 50% or more

equally pernicious is China’s covert recycling of dollar surpluses via offshore money centers to control scarce western assets and influence and corrupt democracies. A synergy between transnational criminal organizations, state intelligence organs, and western middlemen operating in the “gray zone” of global finance have helped route trillions via shell companies into western financial and real estate markets

Recognizing CIPS will never supplant CHIPS and SWIFT, China is looking to “leap-ahead” and capture first-mover advantage and structural network dominance over emerging global fintech and permissioned national blockchain systems

// India seems to be doing this well, and maybe El Salvador…

It is noteworthy that China and Saudi Arabia have increased their strategic partnership, as the
erstwhile U.S. ally has become more geopolitically promiscuous under Mohammed bin Salman. MBS—a millennial autocrat with no taste for democracy but extreme ambitions for domestic development—has
found in Beijing the perfect source of both military support (e.g., ballistic missiles) and construction capabilities to drive his Vision 2030 objectives

China is exporting (and finding strong demand for) a bundled techno-authoritarian “stack”
consisting of dedicated fiber-optic cable networks, cloud hosting, “cybersecurity” services,
5G/Internet of Things digital infrastructure, surveillance equipment, cross-bridged CBDC platforms
(built to integrate with the China’s Digital Currency/Electronic Payment (DC/EP) system of
course), and sophisticated AI monitoring software, alongside onsite training, technical assistance,
and customer support for would be autocrats across the globe.

Thesis: Bitcoin and regulated dollar-based stablecoins may help the U.S. counter adversary efforts to challenge U.S. geoeconomic power while reinforcing liberal value systems around the world.

// liberal value systems in the broad and original sense, I would hope, not the Democratic party “liberalism” we’ve come to see this past decade which disproportionately benefitted specific minority groups at the general expense of most others

Bitcoin and dollar-stablecoin adoption along the frontlines of Cold War 2.0 may serve as a bottom-
up bulwark against China’s geo-monetary network expansion strategy. China has banned Bitcoin in its own country but cannot do the same across the rest of Eurasia, the Middle East, and Africa, many nations of which have relatively permissive cryptocurrency regimes

the United States can take special advantage of the dollar-based stablecoin ecosystem that has emerged to facilitate cryptocurrency trading, especially offshore. The top two largest dollar-pegged stablecoins hold a market cap exceeding $100 billion, and are growing quickly. One can argue that these private stablecoins are winning the fight the U.S. should be fighting against the DC/EP, with market-driven transaction volume in just these two dollar-stablecoins vastly outpacing that of the PBoC’s DC/EP efforts to-date.

// again, users vote with their wallets, and the market wins (in the long-run)

increased demand for these stablecoin issuance (mostly driven by increased demand for Bitcoin, and its rising dollar price) will drive increased demand for U.S. bonds (and other U.S. corporate and municipal debt blessed as “money-good” High Quality Liquid Asset collateral). At a time where foreign demand for our debt is drying up, Bitcoin-driven stablecoin growth can serve as another source of government financing

Note that while the foreign official sector is broadly trying to de-dollarize or diversify their FX
exposure on the margin, the populations in these countries want dollars more than local currencies.
The fact that ~99% of stablecoins are dollar-denominated appears to demonstrate that, absent government forces, the high salability of the dollar will win against other currencies.

// it is interesting and ironic that many states want to move away from the dollar while their citizens clearly want MORE dollars, not less…

Bitcoin is a novel synthetic, and scarce, digital commodity with global fungibility, limited
counterparty risk (zero if self-custodied), large and growing liquidity, and unit scalability to settle any quantity of value. Its monetary properties offer a similar (if not better) scarcity and bearer profile than gold (and other commodities). Its technical properties offer a similar (if not better) transactional and settlement profile than fiat-exchange system rails (e.g., SWIFT, FedWire)

// beautifully said

States will still seek to control and monitor Bitcoin (and related stablecoin) flows as best they can,
which will set up a technical arms-race between protocol development and chain-analysis. Some states may desire the benefits of holding Bitcoin for themselves, but seek to limit domestic, individual engagement.

From a national security perspective, key decision-makers may realize the fact that allowing Bitcoin to monetize alongside (or outpacing gold) would disproportionately benefit the U.S. (whose citizens and firms hold potentially a majority of all Bitcoin, and whose companies and capital markets would grow in tandem). That is, while China and Russia double-down on analog gold, the U.S. can countermove to digital gold.

// this would be a powerful and effective chess move, and maybe Trump / Vance can push us in that direction, but I remain skeptical for now

This is Bitcoin’s cycle. Some thoughts on why

The main character this cycle is clearly Trump; the rest — mostly crypto influencers — are leagues behind Trump in influence and reach, think Ansem (SOL & memecoins) and Pacman (Blast) — no shade to them, it’s just a different ballgame now

With Trump likely to win in November, and with JD Vance as his Veep, it’s clearly positive for crypto regulations; this will be a tailwind for all crypto assets, especially for any coin eligible for an ETF (ETH and maybe SOL), projects attacked by the SEC (Uniswap, Stacks, etc), and yield generating tokens (POS, Defi)

The Presidential election has and seems likely to continue dominating the global news cycle for the rest of 2024, and the only crypto asset likely to get significant attention is Bitcoin; the only other asset with remotely macro-political implications is ETH with its impending ETF launch, but it’s trivial in comparison

Institutional investors now dominate new flows; the only tokens that meet their liquidity and regulatory requirements — for now — are Bitcoin and maybe Ethereum and possibly if I squint Solana

You could make a weak case for AI-related tokens to get some macro-political attention (eg, Worldcoin)

This doesn’t mean pockets of crypto won’t do well, ie, infra L1/2/3/X’s always have a bridge to sell. Likely we’ll see one or more Dogecoin-level memes, and maybe 1-2 consumer apps getting their 15 minutes (like Polymarket).

But this is squarely Bitcoin’s cycle.

Tokens are fashions — part identity, part fad — the change is the point

Fashion is identity — we dress like our friends and colleagues, we dress to communicate what we want others to know about us, and we make instant, mostly subconscious, and often hard-to-change judgments about a person based on what they wear

Fashions change quickly — fads don’t last, but surviving fads become trends — the change is the point

Tokens (stablecoins, memecoins, BTC/ETH) will only grow and proliferate for savings and payments: 10 years ago you could only spend BTC to buy a VPN subscription. Today Shopify has integrated Solana

The tokens you buy, hold, and spend will increasingly resemble fashions — part identity, part trend, but again, the change is the point (aligns perfectly with generational change, ADHD-ification of culture, AI, general societal acceleration)

Tokens as identity: Holding BTC v SOL v ETH is increasingly a statement of who you are and what crowd(s) you identify with, just like wearing Lululemon or driving Tesla or voting Republican

Tokens as trends: ETH was the subversive cool kid in prior cycles; this cycle is SOL’s turn; next cycle will be something new. This is more or less inevitable

Memecoins are mostly fads — some fads may evolve into lasting trends, but the vast majority won’t. Doge did. Shiba kinda did. Maybe WIF will

If tokens are fashions, then the tokens you buy, hold, and use may become increasingly subjective (like your favorite sneaker brand) and less rational (like what stocks to invest)

To succeed, a token project should think more like a consumer or fashion brand than a rational profit-driven investment — more emotion, less ROI. More Chanel, less Munger. More Stanley cup, less 7-in-1 men’s shower product.

Gresham’s law says bad money drives out the good; perhaps in a tokenized economy, interesting money also drives out the boring