Why Ethereum will eventually flippen Bitcoin

tldr: Ethereum’s market cap will surpass Bitcoin’s by 2030

I think that over the next 2 halving cycles, Ethereum’s market cap will overtake Bitcoin’s. I own both assets and probably will for a very long time.

Below are the reasons why I think this will happen. This is a very draft-y article, but I wanted to publish it before laziness or doubt got the better of me.

1. Ethereum is “cheaper” than Bitcoin. Unit bias is real

Investors like lower prices. Lower prices look cheap. Lower prices mean you can own more units. Even if this isn’t logically correct, it’s psychologically true, and this pattern has proven itself in human investing behavior time and again. Why do publicly traded companies do stock splits? Why do meme coins like doge and pepe have such crazy low prices? Similar reasons.

Because Ethereum has ~5x more units than Bitcoin, even if Ethereum market cap equalled Bitcoin’s today, the BTC price per unit would still be more than 5x higher than ETH.

2. Ethereum has unlimited narrative upside. Bitcoin doesn’t

Mainstream media — and the average crypto noob — believes bitcoin to be the new “digital gold”. And beating gold is itself a lofty goal, a good 10-20x higher target than Bitcoin’s current price. I believe Bitcoin will reach that narrative promised land. But where does Bitcoin go after it surpasses gold’s market cap, when it’s worth $500K a coin?

Proponents believe Bitcoin will slowly absorb value from other markets like offshore banking and failing fiat currencies. USD is another $35T. Perhaps Bitcoin could even become the global reserve currency. But that path is primarily political, not technological, and is thus even harder to forecast.

Whereas Ethereum’s sticky metaphors are “digital native computer” and “the decentralized internet” and the “future of finance”. How much is the collective computer industry worth? What about the internet? What about all of finance? And how much will these industries be worth in 10-20 years? Hard to estimate, but the internet itself still has billions more people to onboard. Arguably the upside for Ethereum’s metaphors is unlimited.

*Addendum: In the early days, the common metaphors were Bitcoin = gold and Ethereum = oil. Which one is more critical to societal development and human flourishing? Today it’s clearly oil, but perhaps gold had its moments in previous eras. I’m not sure.

3. ETH pays yield. BTC doesn’t

You may notice by now that many of my points boil down to just focusing on the obvious and not overthinking it.

Ethereum is positioning itself as the Internet’s bond. An internet-native credit asset that pays a consistent and meaningful yield, and investors like yield. Currently it’s sitting at 3% per year.

Further, the global bond market is worth more than $100T, or a nice 400x over today’s Ethereum market cap. Yet another Ethereum comp that is measurably larger than Bitcoin’s digital gold comp.

4. ETH has more use cases than BTC

You can send and receive bitcoin. Those are the two main verbs you can enjoy if you hold bitcoin.

Ethereum has more: You can stake ETH for yield. You can lend, collateralize, and borrow ETH. You can spend it on NFTs and art. You can transfer it between chains and layers.

I’m sure I’m missing other verbs. The pace at which ETH is adding verbs far outpaces BTC’s efforts.

In part, this is because Bitcoin has to some extent sacrificed the potential of its “Bitcoin network” in the interests of preserving the value of its “bitcoin currency”. While Ethereum has tried to balance the needs of both its network and its native currency ETH. Rollups + L2 = needs of network. 1559 and staking = needs of currency.

5. BTC is moving to ETH, but not vice-versa

In some ways, Bitcoin is a financial black hole, sucking the traditional finance world’s monetary energy onto its blockchain. But in crypto itself, ETH is the black hole for BTC. Zoom out, and the growth in wrapped / bridged forms of BTC on Ethereum is clear and consistent.

It’s relatively straightforward to buy and own bitcoin on Ethereum. With that collateral, you can then participate in all of Ethereum’s verbs.

But you can’t do the reverse. There is no method I know of, to move ETH onto Bitcoin’s blockchain. And why would you? You’d be missing out on all of ETH’s verbs and ETH-native staking.

6. ETH has narratives that normies like

With the transition to PoS, ETH is positioned as an ESG friendly asset with a small carbon footprint (unlike BTC with its “miners use more electricity than a large country” false equivalence).

Ethereum has a publicly known and generally liked genius “founder” in Vitalik, who is both very prolific and very measured in his actions. (Unlike BTC with its anonymous founder with the Japanese pseudonym and dogged rumors of a connection with US central intelligence)

Ethereum generates significant and growing revenues, which makes it easier for tradfi to model and value. This helps to tell the Wall Street story. This also gives Ethereum a more sustainable model for blockchain security — while BTC is still reliant on new token emissions.

The ETH ETF trade: if Bitcoin’s ETF is approved, it follows that the same institutions will apply for — and probably get approved — an ETH ETF. This may take a year or more, but the expectation is there and the same pattern has played out with the ETH futures ETF and ETH’s global regulatory acceptance.

Normies understand and use stablecoins. Everyone wants more (US)dollars.  Stablecoin growth will predominantly occur in the ETH ecosystem (and TRON, but let’s not go there). So to use USD or EUR onchain, most normies will likely familiarize themselves with Ethereum and hold some ETH to conduct onchain transactions.

7. ETH actually has LESS regulatory and geopolitical risk

There was a moment there where the SEC wanted to classify ETH as a security. But I think that moment has passed, the risk is now lower in the current US political environment, and this improvement is not priced in.

On all other dimensions, and especially ex-US, Ethereum has arguably less regulatory and political risk. Reasons include, to repeat myself somewhat:

-ETH’s position as an ESG-friendly and sustainable asset

-Bitcoin’s direct competitors are fiat currencies like USD and RMB. Ethereum is more about new internet infrastructure and new financial architecture. Bitcoin competes with nation states, while Ethereum arguably competes with FAANG and banks. Which one worries the politicians more?

-Bitcoin is often called “digital gold”, and the US has banned gold ownership before

-The squeaky wheel gets the grease. Bitcoin is currently the largest and best known cryptocurrency. Bitcoin offers more political points and more at stake for politicians and regulators. For now.

8. It’s not Web3, it’s EVM3

Web3 has been memed to a timely death. But there’s a new 3-letter in town and that is EVM. In other words, Ethereum’s core technology has essentially won the L1 blockchain wars. L1s are the foundation for the decentralized web, and so Ethereum the brand, the tech, and likely the ETH blockchain and $ETH token itself are essentially the basis for whatever we want to call it: Web3, the decentralized web, the new internet, the distributed computer, the blockchain economy, etc.

Aside from Solana, no one talks seriously about competing layer 1s anymore. Every blockchain is slowly becoming a spoke to the ETH hub. Because ETH is where all the value is, where the users are, where the tech innovation is, and where you have access to the most verbs.

Bitcoin’s technology has largely ossified, quite purposefully, and as mentioned before, all the innovation bright spots (like Ordinals, Lightning, Sidechains) lag ETH development by 1-2 cycles.

There’s a lot more that I haven’t covered, and I could probably write a passable if more stretched case for why ETH will never flippen BTC. But the above is what I think *likely* to happen. My bet is that ETH briefly flips BTC this cycle (like late 2024 / early 2025), then it falls back below BTC again during the next bear, then ETH will securely take the top spot in the 2028 halving.

*I’m setting a calendar reminder to come back and review this every 6 months (next up is April 2024)

**I used DALL-E 3 for the lead imagery and I am blown away…

Is money always remade by powerful new technologies?

roblox-robux

In Lyn Alden’s fantastic new book Broken Money, she talks about the natural arc of money towards increasing “hardness”. Any time there’s a new form of money — say, like rare pearls — the ingenuity and incentive of humanity is to find a way to “break” that money by, for instance, developing new ways to harvest and grow the oysters, or manufacture fake replicas, or travel far distances to collect more for less effort. In her (and others’) estimation, this is perhaps the primary reason gold has remained the hardest money for thousands of years. It still hasn’t been broken — but that could change in the future if, for example, we developed asteroid mining or found massive new gold mines.

Anyway, it got me thinking that perhaps new technology is what really drives the development of new money. Gold is an outlier, and we just haven’t yet developed the technology to enable cost-effective gold production or scalable asteroid mining.

The question I’m asking myself is something like — do powerful new technologies almost inevitably lead to the creation of new monies? I use the word “technology” in the broad sense, to quote one of my favorite simple definitions, “technology is anything that breaks a constraint”.

A brief and incomplete history of money follows:

Nature’s commodities eg, shells, teeth, shiny rocks – these required the (then novel) technologies of finding, harvesting, cleaning, storing

Metal coinage – the technologies of mining, smelting, minting, verification

Paper money – the technologies of paper making, writing, printing press (printing @ scale), counterfeit methods

Fiat money – the technologies of nation states (that could organize, distribute, and track it at great scale), distribution networks, telecommunications networks

Bitcoin / Ethereum – the technologies of the internet, cryptography, encryption, digital mining, distributed systems

All of these new monies were the products of new technologies, which both enabled their creation, while also rendering older forms of money either “broken” or inferior.

**On a somewhat related note, think about in-game currencies like Robux in Roblox. The game of Roblox is not a new general purpose technology, but rather an application of many technologies, yet it is cutting edge, and though Roblox the game doesn’t *require* Robux the money to function, it feels like a natural moving forward, in much the same way that humans evolved to prefer burgers and bagels though we could technically eat nuts and plants

Alright I’ve rambled enough. Just wanted to get some thoughts down on blog.

I ask the question because for me, the above conclusion implies that as powerful new technologies are developed, they may inevitably lead to the development of new kinds of money. On the horizon I see technologies like AI, VR / metaverse, bioengineering, and many others (known and unknown). And aliens, of course. Hopefully wise and peaceful ones.

🤔🤔🤔

a16z 2023 State of Crypto – a shallow dive + podcast episode

Went through the a16z 2023 State of Crypto and pulled out some interesting slides + my own notes. I also recorded a podcast episode about it (as part of the 5 minute daily update):

Here we gooo:

Screenshot 2023-04-17 at 3.12.18 PM

Web1 was decentralized (email protocol, web protocol) but limited functionality, and no value accrual

Web2 was centralized into Google, Facebook, etc, advanced functionality, but value accrued to big tech

Web3 is decentralized again, community governed, and value accrues to participants

Screenshot 2023-04-17 at 3.14.28 PM

Web2 take rates are something like 30-100%
30% for services like Spotify and Apple App Store
100% for FB, Twitter

Web3 take rates are much lower – or even pay participants (like ETH’s PoS)
OpenSea is 2.5%, Uniswap is 0.30%

Screenshot 2023-04-17 at 3.15.19 PM

With each cycle, the market gets larger
-higher price
-more usage
-more developers
-more projects

Screenshot 2023-04-17 at 3.15.46 PM

ETH is scaling through rollups
In 2022, L2s paid less than 2% of all ETH fees
Now it’s closer to 7%

Screenshot 2023-04-17 at 3.17.41 PM

The big brands are all here – from mass consumer brands like Starbucks and Adidas and Budweiser to luxury brands like Tiffany and LV and Porsche

Screenshot 2023-04-17 at 3.18.08 PM

DAO governance is growing
From barely 50K monthly proposals in 2021 to more than 200K today
2M unique DAO voters

Screenshot 2023-04-17 at 3.19.50 PM

More than 50K monthly crypto developers on Github

Screenshot 2023-04-17 at 3.20.17 PM

Active addresses steadily growing
From less than 5M in 2018, to more than 15M today, across all blockchains

Screenshot 2023-04-17 at 3.22.40 PM

What A16z expects in the coming years
-Zero knowledge tech will accelerate
-On chain games will grow in popularity
-Light clients will accelerate web3 and mobile
-in the US, bipartisan crypto regulation will pass

Podcast notes – Hasu and Mike on MEV (Bell Curve) – “If a single regulatory regime can make rules in crypto, then crypto has just failed”

Hosts: Hasu and Mike
Hasu – advisor to Flashbots, Lido

MEV value chain
-money from reordering / censoring transactions
any value a privileged actor can extract – eg, Central Bank printing money, can be considered MEV

People use crypto to escape MEV in real world

Should build crypto systems resilient to MEV

Principles in reducing MEV
-more competition = lower fees, less MEV
-more private = harder to extract MEV
-more user control

MEV is invisible – even looking at transaction data in Etherscan, won’t see sandwich attack

Parties:
Users
Wallets
Searchers
Builders
Relayers
Validators

MEV schools
1. Democratizing MEV – hard to minimize MEV, isolate builders role, make it competitive
2. Minimize MEV –

User/wallet layer – order flow auctions – users don’t send to public mempool or block builder, auctions off right to execute your transaction, if there are competing bidders, the price rises, and value goes to user (instead of to MEV capturer)

Mike: “Payment for order flow” – Robinhood offering zero fees, selling order flow to Citadel / hedge funds
Mike: In past, equity brokerages would charge you for trades – now people have opted for free trades / invisible fees (eg, Robinhood)
We can do better in Defi – especially the transparency

World of Cosmos and Ethereum are converging – ETH community has been better at executing
Hard to say in future if X project is ETH or Cosmos project – there’s increasing convergence

MEV accrues to whomever gets to order the transactions
Mike: MEV will accrue to execution layer

L2 sequencers today are centralized – with plans to decentralize – will eventually face same MEV problems as ETH L1
L2s all need PBS (proposer builder separation)

Sequencers today in L2 does 4 things
-receive transactions
-decide on ordering of transactions
-give user a receipt
-send order batch to data availability layer — that’s what creates finality

MEV should not be counted towards security budget — that’s how core devs think about it, want to minimize and not enshrine it
Minimum security should be paid from inflation + base fee

“MEV is very hard to track”

Different forms of MEV
-arbitrage – different prices on different exchanges, or underpriced asset
-sandwich attacks – buy before a user, then sell it to the user at higher price
-liquidations – searchers typically do this

Uniswap V3 – concentrated liquidity – reduced sandwich attacks

Statistical arbitrage – take balance sheet risk, small period of time where you have to hold asset before selling it

Many top Defi traders are also block builders – want to maximize inclusion guarantee, greater control over trading strategy – can make trade at last moment, can see all other transactions and order / cancel them

In systems we build, must make sure they’re not sensitive to latency — otherwise there’s incentive to colocate near each other, more centralization
Phil Daian post on this: https://collective.flashbots.net/t/decentralized-crypto-needs-you-to-be-a-geographical-decentralization-maxi/1385

Turn latency into price / auction, auctions are generally more fair, and price (ability to pay) is easier to decentralize than geographic proximity

Users love Robinhood because good feature is very visible (free trades) and bad feature is very invisible (selling user order flow)

Mike: Optimism and Arbitrum have very different approaches to MEV

“Solana is case study for why to not build low latency blockchains”
1 of 2 Solana block builders is operating liquid staking protocol
If you don’t have robust mempool and fee market design, get a lot of spam
58% of Solana transactions are failed arbitrage transactions

What’s novel in Cosmos —
-Osmosis doing something very interesting – onchain block building and searching
-Noma (sp?) & Penumbra – intent based transaction framework

Mike: Cosmos has very different opinions, diversity of ideas
Hasu: Big drawback is everyone has different validator sets, but as shared security grows, what compromises will be made?

How does regulation bump into MEV?
Crypto is about fair and equitable markets for users with less manipulation and exploitation
Execution on public blockchains is continually improving
Regulators are largely pragmatic

“If a single regulatory regime can make rules in crypto, then crypto has just failed”

Podcast notes – Punk 6529 on Bankless: “NFTs are generic carriers for intangible assets…intangibles are $70 TRILLION”

Why pseudonymous identity
Very intrigued by NFTs in late 2020s
Initially thought it was cute games for kids
Saw Gmoney, Punk4156 – inspired by idea

Idea behind bitcoin – provable ownership

“If you’re not sure, you should just try it”
With tech, you can’t just read about it, you gotta use it

Now he checks in and out of 2 different ecosystems – Facebook is his pre-existing / real identity life
Twitter is his NFT and crypto community – noticed it’s as easy, if not easier, to cooperate and collaborate here, didn’t expect this at first

Fact that NFTs are always visible in wallets – security flaw, but solvable (especially expensive ones, eg, Fidenza)

On bulletin boards 20 years ago — didn’t know ID of those people, just had pseudonymous handles
“It’s not weird at all — you’re all gonna do it”
People present differently online, on LinkedIn v IG v Facebook

The NFT makes the pseudonymous ID provable

RSA: “Don’t trust anyone in crypto who hasn’t used Uniswap”

“No constitutional rights without freedom to transact”

There’s a progressive erosion of freedom

One is tech intermediated —
NYC yellow cabs, pay cash, no one can stop you from using them – decentralized physical activity
Now, Uber can stop you any time for any reason

Two is post 911 AML/KYC
Cash now viewed with suspicion
Impossible to launch “cash” as a product today

End state of all this is a few large databases that intermediate everything — it’s a chokepoint, a honeypot
No thinking about second order effects
Some very ambitious politicians will take control, shut down and control large numbers of people, including their opponents
All of this runs outside of due process
Starts with good intentions, but grows and grows
Network effects which become chokepoints

Crypto’s own permissionless architecture becomes an important counterweight – Bitcoin has no CEO

RSA: there will be 2 types of money — controlled money and free money

NFTs are our best shot at achieving decentralization — that’s why he started 6529

Most of his friends are completely clueless — lots of them think he’s lost his mind about NFTs and crypto
Caught in a MLM scheme or Ponzi

What’s funnier — lots of BTC people can’t get into ETH or vice-versa, or NFTs and DeFi — “have you looked at yourself in the mirror?”

“Hardened veteran of being yelled at”

A lot of super technical crypto lovers shit on NFTs, “kid stuff”

Because crypto was too obsessed with the technology, it was clear it was pre-product market fit
NFTs changed that

You don’t buy a CryptoPunk because it’s on Ethereum

When you talk about applications instead of the tech, you’re at the beginning of consumerization
eg, Dolce Gabbana at an NFT conference!

NFTs = generic carriers for intangible assets

Many things you can do with NFTs that you can’t do with crypto, eg, personal IDs
Big companies are using NFTs, but not bitcoin / ethereum

NFTs are infinitely expressive

Metaverse is just the internet, it’s not gonna be one website
Right now you’re 2 inches tall on my laptop, but in the future you’ll be full size – visualization will improve
You’ll need persistent digital objects — NFTs!

You can survive without Twitter, but not really without email
Politicians can’t ban email — it’s a protocol
Architecture of web 1 was open, inter-operable, came out of academia (eg, email, websites)
Architecture of web 2 came out of Silicon Valley, should have been protocols but was captured by large companies

Metaverse will be your all encompassing ambient digital environment

We have moment in time, next 2-3 years – while others think this tech is a joke – we have opportunity to win a technology shift
Twitter was thought as a joke, a curiosity – 11 years later, huge debate about how POTUS uses it

BTC won’t displace state money – state has tremendously powerful tools
ETH won’t be global computing platform – it’s AWS

You can make NFTs as first amendment protected speech – there will be a Supreme Court case on first amendment grounds

NFTs are
—first mainstream crypto consumer app
—possible to get large companies using and integrating
—less threatening to the state

Intangibles on corporate balance sheets are $70T dollars – far more than gold – and many more intangibles that aren’t on balance sheets at all

NFTs can carry any arbitrary intangible on the internet

“Yes We Can” and “Make America Great” are examples of intangibles that bind humans – memes – intersubjective realities and myths

It’s the underlying fabric of society – and now we can make it composable on the internet